User talk:24.159.60.138

Hi 24.159.60.138, please avoid red linking titiles and names indiscriminately in film festival articles. If a film or name won or was nominated for an award of the official selection, this makes them notable enough to have an article. In all other cases red link should be used sparringly if at all. Thank you. Hoverfish Talk 18:03, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not modify articles and change the link to TriStar Pictures to be spelled differently than the article title - it's not necessary and the edits aren't needed. Thanks :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:53, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 9 (2009 animated film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:59, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tropic Thunder, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:52, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. Thank you for your contributionstoWikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 12:09, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop "fixing" redirects. Per WP:NOTBROKEN, they should just left alone. If someone links to a redirect, it should not be "fixed" to point to the redirect target. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributionstoWikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. You have been asked to use edit summaries, but ignored the request. I am now asking you again. It is a matter of common courtesy. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 13:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at King Arthur: Legend of the Sword. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:14, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Coco (2017 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 01:14, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Specifically WP:NOTBROKEN which you have been informed about before yet continue to ignore Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:56, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's pointless, annoying and discouraged. Gareth (talk) 15:56, 20 October 2018 (UTC) Gareth (talk) 15:58, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edittoArizona State University— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:37, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of DreamWorks Pictures films, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:22, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at I Want It All (Queen song). - FlightTime (open channel) 19:28, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned in the section just above. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  caknuck _° needs to be running more often 04:52, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=I would rather be unblocked so I can continue to update some pages on Wikipedia. ~~~~}}.  –Darkwind (talk) 04:26, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.