Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Black Hills. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.-Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:54, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Meters (talk) 20:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:2022 monkeypox outbreak. Meters (talk) 20:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Oil sands. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You have been undone multiple times by various editors. We have asked you to discuss this, in manageable-sized chunks. Do not continue to make this massive deletion without consensus. Do not continue to add unsourced material. And you have already been warned about attacking other editors, but you continue to do so. Meters (talk) 18:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Oil sands. The lead is a summary of important facts form the article. I tis not a place to add new, unsourced commentary Meters (talk) 18:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The content you added was copied from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa (talk) 15:29, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Right O.
I can easily do that.
I'll also make sure I put on my "to edit list" the Wikipedia article hate speech symbols, so if a fellow editor needs to link to an image of a hate speech symbol, it is not a copyright violation.
Thanks for the information, I hope you have a nice day.
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |
