Welcome!
21:20, 30 May 2019 (UTC) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!
Your host, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.
Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.
Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSSorAtom format. |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.
If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (74.42.44.210) is used to identify you instead.
I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).
Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 23:39, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Dixie Dregs, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 02:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Big Smo, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:51, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Do not use multiple IP addressestovandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Chuck Berry on Stage. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Block evasion by Special:Contributions/166.182.84.40. Binksternet (talk) 02:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edittoStanding in the Spotlight, you may be blocked from editing. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 21:09, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:18, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
74.42.44.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is a shared IP. No block evasion. 74.42.44.210 (talk) 22:00, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
The block is working as intended. If you know nothing about it, you can either wait the block out, or request an account at WP:ACC to avoid this problem in the future. 331dot (talk) 23:16, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
74.42.44.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
How is the block "working as intended" when you remove legitimate contributions and prevent people from restoring content maliciously deleted by vandals? 74.42.44.210 (talk) 23:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:10, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
74.42.44.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not block evading or making disruptive edits.
Decline reason:
This appeal is clearly going nowhere. Talk page access revoked. Optimist on the run (talk) 20:48, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is block evasion by User:Sugar Bear, who uses many IPs, including this one from Cave Junction, Oregon. Binksternet (talk) 03:57, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Binksternet: This is false. I am not Sugar Bear or block evading. 74.42.44.210 (talk) 19:07, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, 74.42.44.210. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
Message added 21:15, 22 June 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edittoYou Never Met a Motherfucker Quite Like Me. Aspening (talk) 19:32, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
74.42.44.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not Sugar Bear. This accusation is false.
Decline reason:
Talk page access revoked, block extended. 331dot (talk) 20:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 20:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Esham. Block evasion by User:Sugar Bear. Binksternet (talk) 19:30, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
74.42.44.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is a shared IP.
Decline reason:
No evidence in the recent history that this IP has been used by anyone either the intended target of the block. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:15, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
74.42.44.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This IP is for a public library. Not an individual.
Decline reason:
Irrelevant; this IP was still used for engaging in disruption and has been blocked for that reason. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:20, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
74.42.44.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
I see you've already had your talk page access revoked. Good. Yamla (talk) 21:24, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Do not use multiple IP addressestovandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Expresso II. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Block evasion by User:Sugar Bear. Binksternet (talk) 22:13, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 23:42, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on The Cry of Love, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. The previous discussion at the article's talk page led to a consensus of having both "studio" and "compilation" types in the infobox. Dan56 (talk) 20:53, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:58, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
74.42.44.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is a shared IP on a public library computer. There has been ZERO BLOCK EVASION. It is NOT "the same editor" as any non-fictional blocked user.
Decline reason:
Talk page access revoked. 331dot (talk) 21:16, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is a SHARED IP. NO ONE HAS EVER USED IT FOR "BLOCK EVASION". IT IS A PUBLIC LIBRARY COMPUTER.
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |