Contents

User talk:A E WORLD

Hi A E WORLD! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

• Please read MOS:OVERLINK

2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 08:24, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked over some of your edits, A E WORLD, and they mostly involve overlinking and grammatical errors. If this continues, I'll ask for administrative help--there's a lot of clean up you've left behind.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 08:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 08:44, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 08:50, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Lourdes 09:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sneaking in New Zealand details in a Nigeria-focused article,[1] reformatting good paragraphs into bad ones,[2][3], and incessant overlinking without communicating, are not conducive to building a collaborative work environment. Please stop making such mistakes. Once you respond that you understand your mistakes and that you have understood Wikipedia's editorial policies and guidelines (and will adhere to them), any administrator may unblock you without checking with me. Thank you, Lourdes 09:14, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A E WORLD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for the incessant over linking without communicating. Also, the issue of sneaking in New Zealand detail to a Nigeria-focused article and reformating good paragraph into bad ones was a mistake. I would like to appeal for an unblock, as I will start making productive contributions.

Decline reason:

Nothing here convinces me you plan to be a constructive editor. Yamla (talk) 12:13, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• I have reformatted your unblock request so any administrator can take a look at it. But have you read our editorial content policies? Thanks, Lourdes 12:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lourdes Yamla I have gone through the content policy. There is instruction on:Article titles,biography of living persons (not using Unsourced or poorly sourced materials that are contentious), writing from a neutral point of view, citing sources and doing quality research before writing an article. I have also reached out to a Nigeria community, where I can learn to be a better editor. I am sorry for reformating good paragraphs into bad ones, disruptive editing and incessant over linking without communicating. I want to make meaningful contributions to Wikipedia.I appeal for an unblock.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A E WORLD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have gone through the content policy. There is instruction on:Article titles,biography of living persons (not using unsourced or poorly sourced materials that are contentious), writing from a neutral point of view, citing sources and doing quality research before writing an article. I have also reached out to a Nigeria community, where I can learn to be a better editor. I am sorry for reformating good paragraphs into bad ones, disruptive editing and incessant over linking without communicating. I want to make meaningful contributions to Wikipedia.I appeal for an unblock

Decline reason:

I suggest that you first learn how to be a constructive editor, and then come back and demonstrate that to us in an unblock request. You can also edit another Wikimedia project where you are not blocked and use that to show us you can be constructive. 331dot (talk) 08:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.