Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website, I have blocked this account from editing. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.
You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you mustdisclose who is paying you to edit here.
Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here.The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.
To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username on this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken or in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.
Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".
Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Hello Aftab Ashraf at ACE Money Transfer. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Aftab Ashraf at ACE Money Transfer. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Aftab Ashraf at ACE Money Transfer|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Dan arndt (talk) 09:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Dan arndt,
Good Day!
Perhaps, there has aroused a confusion leading to an expression that the article has an undisclosed financial stake. I would like to briefly explain that no such case is involved and the article is purely unpaid, which is written and requested to be published solely for my company's information and history deemed at user's awareness about the firm.
I hereby infer that the article deems not to be used for any commercial purposes not it's paid in any case. It's purely informational showcasing my company's information to the global users.
Please let me know if there's any further explanation required in this regard, or you have any questions. I would be happy to respond.
I've been asked to make a disclosure of payment, which I'm doing here. But, I must reiterate here that I'm neither directly nor indirectly paid for the Wikipedia Edits, at all.
{{paid|user=Aftab Ashraf at ACE Money Transfer|employer=ACE Money Transfer|client=NA}}
You need to place that on your user page, but without the "nowiki" tags around it(which suppresses its proper display). 331dot (talk) 09:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, including the curly brackets (they are what makes this a template), but excluding the nowiki wrapper which has been used to render that template in this thread (so as to not result in an actual template, only a dummy thereof). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:29, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Probably easier if I do it. If you're unhappy with it, edit the disclosure to your liking; otherwise we'll assume that you consent to this. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:13, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That seems a reasonable option. Please proceed and let me know once you've done it. Make sure that no direct payment is referred since I'm not getting any direct payment against the Wikipedia page publishing. It falls under my job description to do it besides other tasks. Aftab Ashraf at ACE Money Transfer (talk) 07:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hello, Aftab Ashraf at ACE Money Transfer!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:45, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
The comment the reviewer left was:
The advertorial must go and the sourcing must improve
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hello, Aftab Ashraf at ACE Money Transfer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.