Contents

User talk:Aintabli

Let's eat sweet, talk sweet
Some kahke Gayfe A whole tray of pəklava

Aintabli,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 20:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 20:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I wish you a great new year as well. Aintabli (talk) 00:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Selam @Aintabli, yeni yılın için sana; sağlıklı, huzurlu ve mutlu seneler diliyorum :) Bu maddeyi İngilizce olarak çevirebilir misin? Ygmr01 (talk) 13:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Teşekkür ederim. Size de iyi seneler. Kayda değerlik kriterlerine göre değerlendirip maddeyi eklemeye çalışacağım. Aintabli (talk) 00:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Teşekkür ederim @Aintabli, Üniversite olduğu için olur bence. Zaten öğrenim gördüğüm üniversitedir, baktığım zaman diğer Türk üniversiteleri açılmış kendi üniversitemin olmaması üzdü bendi :)… Bu arada eğer maddeyi açacaksan rektör değişti bu gün. 3 Ocak itibari ile Prof. Dr. Buğra Özen atandı. Ygmr01 (talk) 17:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NSCHOOL'a göre üniversiteler de bu konuda değerlendirilmeli. Önceden bir okul için sayfa oluşturmadığım için bu alanda pek spesifik tecrübem yok ama kriterler uyarınca okul hakkında yazılmış, okulun kendisinden bağımsız birkaç güvenilir kaynak lazım. Belki siz de yardımcı olabilirsiniz. Ben belli sayıda haber kaynağı buldum. Yeterince üzerinde çalıştıktan sonra okulun sayfasını yaratabilirim. Aintabli (talk) 21:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okulun kendisinden hariç pek kaynak yok galiba, bakıcam bu konuda birşey bulursam çok iyi olur… Çok teşekkür ederim bu arada… Ygmr01 (talk) 21:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10 adet kaynak ekledim… Umarım işe yarar, yaramaz isede canın sağolsun, düşüncen bile benim için çok kıymetli…

Bu arada bana ulaşmak istersen Türkçe Viki’de aktif şekildeyim oraya yazman yeterlidir… Sevgilerle @Aintabli

Kaynak1, kaynak2, Kaynak3, Kaynak4, Kaynak5, kaynak6, Kaynak7, Kaynak8, Kaynak9, Kaynak10 Ygmr01 (talk) 21:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Aintabli, since you undertook a GA review for the Regency of Algiers article, i was wondering if you were still on it or it's now left for another reviewer after renomination, if you're still on it, do you consider the issues raised solved ? Best. Nourerrahmane (talk) 21:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nourerrahmane, when I've first taken a look at the article, the length simply was a major issue that merited a quickfail, because it could take quite some time to solve. However, you were very responsive and tackled the issue in a few hours or days. There is still a tag, which I remember you had removed. So, if you did not readd it yourself, some other editor may believe the article still needs trimming. I can make further suggestions for the time being. Armed forces should not be a full standalone section, because it is merely made up of two wikilinks. It may still be worth reducing the number of pictures and especially removing the image "inside" the table in Mandatory royalties and gifts, because it deforms its size in my opinion. I see some references that are full citations and should be moved to the Bibliography. And some lack page numbers, such as Bloom, Jonathan M. (2020) (currently 268th footnote). Please go through all of them, so all relevant citations have a page number and are ideally fully cited in the Bibliography section. Aintabli (talk) 22:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Aintabli, i've worked on the article based on your suggestions. Best. Nourerrahmane (talk) 01:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nourerrahmane, great job! Do you think the lengthy quote in Regency of Algiers#Legacy is absolutely necessary? The quote occupies most of the section, so I would either trim or paraphrase. I don't have more in-depth comments, but I will ping you when I have more. Aintabli (talk) 19:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! i think it gives an overview of Algiers against what was the general idea of it is, but i might paraphrase it, also i made some changes because i felt i needed to highlight a bit about the Dey Ben Othman Pasha, as his rule represents the Apogee of Algiers in the 18th century while i did some trimming in other subsections and included them in his rule. Nourerrahmane (talk) 20:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ghars al-Din Khalil you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 23:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ghars al-Din Khalil you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ghars al-Din Khalil and Talk:Ghars al-Din Khalil/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 18:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ghars al-Din Khalil you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ghars al-Din Khalil for comments about the article, and Talk:Ghars al-Din Khalil/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eretnid dynasty you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Eretnid dynasty and Talk:Eretnid dynasty/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 22:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Friend , Hi, I saw you're request at WP:PERM/NPR and also saw you're CSD log is seems to good and I know you understand speedy deletion policy but I see you don not work as Afc reviewers on WP:AFC but I suggest to you; please starts work as Afc reviewers, on request at WP:WAC/P and It's help to increasing you're policy knowledge, and you know and admin before granting you this permission they checking your [AFC Status] and other things and if they satisfied from your knowledge and you're contributions then he grant you this advanced permission. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 04:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to evaluate a fellow requester. I'll consider your advice. Aintabli (talk) 04:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Aintabli! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)17:54, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

Hi Aintabli. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
• Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
• Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. —Ganesha811 (talk) 04:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eretnid dynasty you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eretnid dynasty for comments about the article, and Talk:Eretnid dynasty/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 17:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the horon dance: how does Kaa sing to Mowgli?『🎶 Trust in meee... Just in mee!』I knew what I was doing, for a change :)) Cheers, Arminden (talk) 00:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Preach. Aintabli (talk) 00:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Horon (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Invalid and unnecessary disambiguation page containing the primary topic and only one other topic. All other search results were partial title matches.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 05:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why Horon (disambiguation) was recreated? I'm not entirely sure what went down. It is an invalid DAB as it stands right now so is likely to be PRODed again. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:49, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AllTheUsernamesAreInUse, I did not recreate Horon (disambiguation). After the PROD, I requested the speedy deletion of the page. It was deleted, but then Arminden recreated the page. It was moved for numerous times after that. Aintabli (talk) 04:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thank you for explaining. Do you know Arminden's reasoning in recreating it? AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that, I think I know now. Should I send it to AfD now? Are either of you likely to oppose deletion? AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:58, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can explain the situation to Arminden and ask them to request its speedy deletion (WP:G7). Aintabli (talk) 05:00, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eretna you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Eretna and Talk:Eretna/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 20:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mutahharten you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 21:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, colleague. I would like to ask you for help with this resource request – Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request/Archive_167#Sources about Anton Çelebi. I see that you are busy now, but I will be grateful to you at any time.

With respect, Smpad (talk) 12:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Smpad Asonk ktnel bidi pordzem. Yete ktnel grnai, yes kez bidi isem! Aintabli (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up hereorask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eretna you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eretna for comments about the article, and Talk:Eretna/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 08:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I know why you have reverted my edits. As you can see, I have removed the extra sources and extra content which is not needed for the article. Thanks. Archery minded (talk) 05:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you're trying to say this is a cleanup. You have also removed a whole section, which doesn't look extra. If the issue is whether the sources are WP:RS, be sure to state that in the edit summary to avoid misunderstandings. Aintabli (talk) 05:14, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's per WP:FILMMARKETING. I hope you understood. Thanks. Archery minded (talk) 05:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I support Archery minded in this. The article is bloated and violates WP:CITEKILL, he is just cleaning it up. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Be more careful next time, because the edit tripped the filter. Aintabli (talk) 05:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope I can restore my edits. Thanks to both of you. Archery minded (talk) 05:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your immensely prolific Good Article work for the Anatolian beyliks! I can't overstate how great it is for the encyclopedia to have such a committed editor in a relatively obscure area of history. Generalissima (talk) 04:11, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Generalissima, thank you so much for the kind words. You've made my day! It's an honor for me that you appreciate my work. Aintabli (talk) 05:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi anitabli I was looking at kurdistan region article in wikipedia and the information were outdated they said kurdistan have four governorate duhok.erbil.slemani.helabje but now zakho is also a governorate they didn't add it i said about it in the talk page but no one answered me can you fix it and thank you for reading this Hogirkurdish15 (talk) 21:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please provide the sources (at least links) for others to check. Then, someone might add it to the article. Aintabli (talk) 00:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yakub I of Germiyan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 23:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yakub II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 23:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Aintabli for collecting 25 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:17, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ali of Eretna you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 16:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ali of Eretna you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ali of Eretna and Talk:Ali of Eretna/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ali of Eretna you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ali of Eretna for comments about the article, and Talk:Ali of Eretna/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yakub II you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Yakub II and Talk:Yakub II/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 00:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ahi Ayna you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yakub II you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Yakub II and Talk:Yakub II/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 22:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain why you marked the Andrew Clarence David Young article as "non-free". GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 18:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t have access to the tools through my phone, but I remember that the article showed about 60% resemblance to another publication. Aintabli (talk) 21:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article now shows a 3.8% (at most) similarity with another publication so I believe the issue has been sorted. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 21:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it appears to have been solved. Aintabli (talk) 21:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Eretnid dynasty at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Z1720 (talk) 15:05, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yakub II you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yakub II for comments about the article, and Talk:Yakub II/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aintabli,

Your tagging of this draft article was appropriate, thank you. However, for CSD G5s, when you are using Twinkle, please put the username of the sockmaster, the editor who is evading a block, in the field, not the name of the sockpuppet. This is because the Twinkle deletion rationale will appear on the article and it is more important to know that editor who is the sockmaster than the identity of any particular sockpuppet. It's also because if an admin has a question, they can go look at the most recent SPI case and those are filed under the sockmaster's username, not the sockpuppet's. Thanks again for your work on the project. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:38, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes with Draft:Black Tiger (Pilingê Reş) Forces. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice and explanation. Will make sure I include the name of the sockmaster next time. Aintabli (talk) 04:38, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mutahharten you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mutahharten and Talk:Mutahharten/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 14:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yakub I of Germiyan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yakub I of Germiyan for comments about the article, and Talk:Yakub I of Germiyan/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 00:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aintabli,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shah Suwar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amir Ghandi -- Amir Ghandi (talk) 07:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shaban Suli you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shah Suwar you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shah Suwar for comments about the article, and Talk:Shah Suwar/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amir Ghandi -- Amir Ghandi (talk) 00:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shaban Suli you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shaban Suli for comments about the article, and Talk:Shaban Suli/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aintabli, Büdeyri Hanı [tr] Why didn't u open this article? Lionel Cristiano^? 17:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the Turkish article is not sourced. I would have to find enough coverage of it before creating an article here. Aintabli (talk) 21:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really convinced that there's a real rationale for these recent moves, or that it's necessarily optimal. AFAIK there hasn't been a discussion at WikiProject Islam or MOS:ISLAM that "Grand Mosque of" should be the default naming convention, and while consistency is a general principle here, it's not clear that this format is even the most common, and therefore what we might prefer as a default. On the contrary, on individual pages it often flies in the face of sources. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article titles should be WP:CONSISTENT. The earlier forms are closer to the Turkish convention, which does not align with the common form in English. Aintabli (talk) 15:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there aren't English sources presented, the form closest to the Turkish is closer to the actual sources we have. Also in literature, some are grand, some are great. There's a lot of variety. I'm also not convinced there even is a definitive common form in English. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What sources are currently present in the article are irrelevant, considering that most of these articles are in poor shape. See this and this for example. This form is obviously more common. The “grand” vs “great” difference is something I do not object, and if most English sources use it for a given mosque, would vote in favor of changing. On the other hand, the town name doesn’t come first in English as per the links above. That’s two major reasons. Aintabli (talk) 16:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It still would have been better, and still would be better, if you took this up with some relevant WikiProjects rather than imposing your stylistic preference based on somewhat flimsy grounds. There are a couple factors at play. One is the trend within scholarship for the titling of Turkish mosques specifically, because on the great vs grand contrast there are actually some regional variations. More generally, as you can see from this Ngram, your chosen form is if anything the weakest of all and only accounts for the barest minority of mentions of grand mosques generally, and is statistically all but insignificant when factoring in the mentions of great mosques as well. It is for exactly these sorts of reasons that is often worth reaching out to the community before doing sweeping renaming without inquiry. Iskandar323 (talk) 17:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Ngrams results include nothing tangible. As you add more words to a phrase, it will be much rarer. Getting more instances of “Grand mosque” does not mean the location name comes before in a specific case or that it is part of a proper name in every case. I also don’t remember moving any of the articles from “great” to “grand”, so I don’t understand why you’re arguing that an unspecified page should be “great” here. On a different note, looking at the articles’ edit histories, I have now realized that you have also previously moved multiple pages to a preferred title. I have taken a bold approach and at least made moves in line with WP:CONSISTENT and per the links, a common form among scholarship. You have the right to disagree with these changes and could have instead started a discussion on a different and openly visible page instead of making behavioral comments on my user talk page. I will start that discussion when I get behind my computer if you don’t do so before. But I don’t see any specific argument here, so I am unsure what approach you prefer. If you are arguing that this should be looked at case by case, you have tried to prove “great” is more common in general, which my moves did not concern. So, do you want something like an RFC or a move request for each article? Aintabli (talk) 18:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to move this to a WikiProject. Iskandar323 (talk) 20:15, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can start a new discussion (RFC) there precisely describing what you want to be changed in the guidelines. Aintabli (talk) 20:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not talking about guidelines or RFCs; just informing relevant WikiProjects and inviting input. Iskandar323 (talk) 20:25, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it's not the guidelines, I'm not sure what input you want. There are two possible choices: Change in guidelines or requesting moves on each page after determining what the common name is. I have started doing the latter. Aintabli (talk) 20:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Iskandar323 (talk) 20:31, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I'm not trying to be acrimonious here; just trying to ensure that sweeping changes aren't being made for not necessarily fully thought out reasons. You are arguing that your approach is consistent, but you haven't, for example, shown an expert tertiary source that consistently follows this pattern. You also seem to know Turkish, so I'm not sure why you're insisting on a format that is further from the Turkish. Name+ulucami => Name+grand mosque is a much more common sense approach than your consistency drive. Iskandar323 (talk) 20:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this has gotten too complicated. We can start clean, but I don't want to deep-dive into a discussion again. I think the simplest approach would be to determine the common name and then request moves on each page accordingly. Aintabli (talk) 20:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To wrap up/clarify/summarize, I am now starting a few move requests as time allows. For example, the mosque in Erzurum is better known as "great". But that was not the point of my earlier moves, which were meant to implement CONSISTENT and English conventions. Looking at your comments here and earlier moves, I do not believe you have checked any English sources on these mosques, and it appears that per your move summaries, you were "standardizing" the names rather than doing what you are telling me to do. Aintabli (talk) 19:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I performed moves previously to render Turkish names into English I believe. One obvious drawback of the "of" variant is that it is less concise – it adds an unnecessary preposition with no additional meaning or value. Secondly, it is less preferred in terms of our standard naming practice, which is to put the where before the what – I imagine principally because location names are what lend the precision, while nounal elements are generic. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are English sources on many if not most of these mosques, so rendering Turkish names is not what we need right now. When it comes to brevity, "of" is merely 2 characters long, and that is not the typical case when a "concise" title would be favorable. I believe you may want to start an RFC about including location names first when naming articles on mosques/buildings regardless of a common name. Such articles both in and outside Turkey have been in the "of" form for a long time. Aintabli (talk) 20:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, not regardless of a common name; in the absence of one. I'm not the one assuming a common form/name format for Turkish mosques. Iskandar323 (talk) 20:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. Aintabli (talk) 20:15, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mutahharten you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mutahharten for comments about the article, and Talk:Mutahharten/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 08:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ahi Ayna you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 08:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aintabli, I've moved KarasitoKarasi (horse) per the RM discussion. I've disambiguated most of the links to the new dab page, but there are still a few ambiguous links that you may want to take a look at. Like you mentioned in the discussion, there seems to be some ambiguity whether "Karasi" refers to the ruler or the dynasty more generally. Thanks – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 06:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's been dealt with. Aintabli (talk) 13:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/KurdîmHeval, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/KurdîmHeval and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/KurdîmHeval during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 13:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Değerli katkılarınız için teşekkürler. HİPOTEZ (talk) 18:27, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for appreciating my work. Aintabli (talk) 18:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you have an article listed at WP:GAN. I recently started a project, Good Article Review Circles, and thought you might be interested. This initiative helps articles get reviewed more quickly through collaborative efforts. By joining, you'll review others' articles and get your own reviewed in return. Check out the page for more details! — GMH Melbourne (talk) 14:48, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ahi Ayna you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ahi Ayna and Talk:Ahi Ayna/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 19:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey around 5 am in the morning, you're invited to following page, i do not know if i put enough pepper and garlic while writing the article. Would you like to check it out? Beyran_soup Göycen (talk) 21:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for cooking that article. The main ingredients should be WP:RS and page numbers. I believe a move to Beyran may be in order per WP:COMMONNAME. Aintabli (talk) 22:14, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ahi Ayna you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ahi Ayna for comments about the article, and Talk:Ahi Ayna/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 14:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mehmed of Dulkadir you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 14:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Suleiman I of Candar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 14:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ali of Dulkadir you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 17:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ali of Dulkadir you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ali of Dulkadir and Talk:Ali of Dulkadir/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 11:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]