Contents

User talk:Alanaxl182

The article Nadia Hilker has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 01:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi There. I've had to delete this image as the license is clearly incorrect. The image is (C) 2013 to Robert Redfield and is not freely licensed. In general any image you find on the internet is copyrighted and most cannot be uploaded to Wikipedia - Peripitus (Talk) 11:34, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Leftovers (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, a few notes about some of your recent edits, like this one and this one. If you are here at Wikipedia to add genres to articles, you should be supporting every single addition with a reliable published source. Genre is a subjective classification, and we are not interested in people's personal interpretations in articles, particularly when people start making distinctions between recognized television genres like "Comedy" and unrecognized sub-genre like "Surreal comedy". We're not here to micro-classify things, only to present generally what broad category a project falls into. "Comedy". "Sitcom". "Drama". "Police procedural". Not "post-anarcho-steampunk surreal black comedy". Editors who make a habit of changing genre per their personal point of view will absolutely wind up blocked.

Next up: The majority of your recent edits have been marked as minor, however they are not minor. Edits should only be marked as minor when you make uncontroversial, superficial changes, like adding wikilinks, removing wikilinks, fixing a typo, reverting vandalism. Adding new genres and removing old ones are absolutely controversial and not superficial. These are not minor edits: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] and so on.

Lastly, I'm having trouble understanding edits like this one, where you add electronicore, which doesn't appear in the reference, and you removed mathcore, which is sourced. Granted, I probably would have avoided mathcore myself, because it is a subgenre, but I'm curious what your rationale is for removing that content and adding unsourced content. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:09, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY: hi Cyphoidbomb, I've read what you had to say and I would like to say thanks for the observation I'll be looking forward to improve myself on that. alanaxl182 (talk) 12:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your open mind and your willingness to change, thank you. Happy editing. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Please stop changing infobox genres, especially when they're sourced, without some sort of consensus. czar 03:55, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Porn Again, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Robvanvee 16:08, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. You were previously warned to not remove well-cited genres (like you did with emo at My Chemical Romance) without proper rationale and consensus. The source you added saying they aren't emo isn't reliable, and even if it was, it's just one source against the four cited in the article saying they are emo. Also, keep in mind the thoughts of the band themselves should not affect infobox genres, per WP:THIRDPARTY. Kokoro20 (talk) 00:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY: hello, I understand the circumstances. I just thought it was okay to do the edit based on those "reliable" facts. sorry, my bad, I'm still trying to learn the right way to do it. alanaxl182 (talk) 12:18, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Republic of Wolves, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keyboard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Steven Wilson, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 15:27, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]