Contents

User talk:AlejandroFC

	The Original Barnstar
	For your comprehensive and detailed expansion of Territory of the Islamic State - Applodion (talk) 12:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Applodion: Thank you! :D AlejandroFC (talk) 21:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		Thank you for reformatting the flags on New Spain, it looks much better. 296cherry (talk) 18:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted because the Spanish flags are not proper flags of the viceroyalty. Thanks. Vicentemovil (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I based the changes off of the New France page, which uses the French flag itself, and the Russian/Chinese viceroyalties (the former are linked on the Spanish page). In any case, the infobox could be updated to reflect modern overseas territories'. AlejandroFC (talk) 19:41, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the same case. New France has no symbols of its own. The Spanish viceroyalties do have their own symbols. Vicentemovil (talk) 23:48, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I was nevertheless suggesting a compromise, similar to what today are considered overseas territories, e.g. French Guiana, or perhaps consistency with other territories' pages, such as the African territories of Spanish SaharaorSpanish Guinea. All of these use their own symbols, with the former using the emblems alone, while the latter use both the national flag and the local emblem. AlejandroFC (talk) 00:06, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Compromise isn't the appropriate word now that I read my comment again. So, to explain myself better: perhaps it would also be appropriate to replace the country infobox with the subdivision infobox, or maintain consistency with other Spanish territories' pages' format. AlejandroFC (talk) 00:08, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have said it elsewhere, the problem comes from putting up Spanish flags that are not symbols of the Spanish-American viceroyalties. Maybe, perhaps, the best thing to do is to remove the Cross of Burgundy from the Infobox. Vicentemovil (talk) 13:43, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Sanctuary of Saint Rose of Lima is an excellent article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for writing embassy without a government. A fantastic article. Chetsford (talk) 02:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! AlejandroFC (talk) 05:09, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Intercorp. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Suntoloo Panoom (talk) 09:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

—Kusma (talk) and theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AlejandroFC, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, ENAPU, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ENAPU.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jirón de la Unión (Metropolitano), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jirón de la Unión (Metropolitano) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AlejandroFC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rímac Valley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Intercorp, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hello, AlejandroFC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rímac Valley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Casa Fernandini (1958).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. Onthe file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 03:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beit Jala Palestina 1937.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 03:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Autogolpe Lima 1992.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 04:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]