Would you mind explaining me the purpose of these sub pages. I am asking because there is no Kurdistan-stub and it was deleted before. -- Cat chi? 21:30, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Plese see User:AlexNewArtBot for the description of the bot's work. Basically it daily looks through the list of the new articles and puts into the lists of new articles according to some rules. The generated new article lists are mostly used for the wiki projects, some are used for the other tasks (e.g. "good articles" recommended for DYK, "autobiographies" for COI, etc.) User:AlexNewArtBot/Kurdistan are the new rules for the Kurdistan related articles. The $$stub$$ rule supposed to be used for the automatic assignment of the stub type. Currently this functionality is turned off by the decision of the Bot Approval Group so the statement has no effect. In future if I would ever get the approval it would be better if {{Kurdistan-stub}} was there (maybe as a redirect to another template) or the $$Kurdistan-stub$$ was not in the rules. Otherwise the bot would insert invalid templates to the articles. I have no desire to argue the bot's case in the nearest future, though, so you have plenty of time Alex Bakharev 22:11, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Guys! My decision means nothing for the plight of the template. Currently the stub line in the rules have no effect whatever. In future we could just redirect the {{Kurdistan-stub}}to{{MEast-stub}} or whatever or I can remove the line. I do not intend to enable the stub sorting feature in the foreseeable future so your argument here is just waste of your time. The stub templates are a maintenance thing, they are suppose to make life easier not the other way around. One of the main requirements for a stub type is more than a hundred articles (60 to make the thing started). Do you really have so many Kurdistan-related stubs. The other thing is that it is a controversial issue that might spark edit wars instead of encouraging expanding the articles. I understand all the difficulties and have no intention to intervene with the issue, honestly Alex Bakharev 02:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. This is a reminder to people on the Melbourne meetup participation list that the next meetup has been arranged for 19 June. Could you indicate on the meetup page your likely attendence, or otherwise. Regards. - Cuddy Wifter 23:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alex, I noticed you amended this user's block from indefinite to one month. I have restored this to indefinite. Please discuss blocks with the blocking administrator before amending them.
M.V.E.i. was not blocked for mere 'incivility'. He was blocked indefinitely for racist comments, soapboxing, trolling and hate speech. A selection of his comments include:
Did you even review the diffs provided in the initial post to WP:AN/I? Please do not reduce the user's block length again. Neil ╦ 09:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Though I strongly believe that M.V.E.i is not a racist, absolutely agree with Alex, can provide more arguments, etc., it is clear that discussion became pointless. All I want to add now is that M.V.E.i is a young man, who should be given a chance. Indefinite block is not a good lesson and could only anger him. Beatle Fab Four 16:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alex, I would like you to check [4] as I have some problems with your latest comment there.--Staberinde 16:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have reremoved a blocking review box on User talk:M.V.E.i. that I readded after he removed it. Blocking review boxes should not be removed before the block is over, and in long blocks, a few days after that. Please rereadd. Digwuren 11:22, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Something is going on with Anna Politkovskaya. I know, Ghirlandajo is considered respected editor here, but he repeatedly tries to insert baseless and, I believe, misleading claims about Politkovskaya's ethnicity. He seems to equate ethnicity and race, which is far from current understanding of this term. Colchicum 15:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly is meant by this set of pages? I noticed that an article I recently worked on is listed, along with my username, in "Archive 9" of that category, thus I'm curious what the problem is and how to fix it, if it's serious. —freak(talk) 10:04, Jun. 10, 2007 (UTC)
As the discussion on WP:AN/I has once again ground to a halt with the same people preferring to bitch the same things about the same old nationality rubbish rather than address the original question, I have suggested to M.V.E.i. that if he is willing to pledge to behave from now on, and to stop any kind of nationalistic bigotry, hate speech or racism, I will reduce his block length to 2 months. Seems like a reasonable compromise between the month half called for and the indefinite block the other half wanted. How does that sound? Neil ╦ 21:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Holocaust
Q:How many Jews were killed by Estonian SS legioners? (Sic. Not a word about Estonian Jews only)
[5] Quote from DLX: “As for your second question, that is easy: 0. They [Estonian legion] did not participate in Holocaust”. No comments.
[6] Quotes from DLX: 1) “You asked how many were killed by Estonian SS (that is Waffen-SS legion, as there were no Estonians in SS-proper). And the answer is still the same – none”. 2) “And prime minister [Ansip] apologized for actions of a few collaborators - to be honest, I don't know if any other country has done that.” No comments.
[7] Quote from DLX: “Actually, what I said was that Estonian SS-Legion didn't participate in Holocaust in Estonia (they weren't formed before 1942, Holocaust in Estonia was done by the end of 1941) - or abroad. This still stands”. No comments.
[8] Quote from someone Martintg: “How can the Estonian Legion be involved in killing Jews, the Legion wasn't formed until 1942, after Estonia's Jews were killed in 1941”. No comments.
Some other references:
[9] Quote from DLX: “Nazi capitulation? There was no such thing”. No comments.
[10] Quote from DLX: “fifty years of Russian occupation was definitely worse then three years of German rule” No comments.
[11] Quote from DLX: “I am an established (1000+ edits) user, who hasn't broken any wikipedia rules, ever” Comment: He was lying, was blocked before. See his block log: [12]
[13] Quote from DLX: “looters and thieves are heroes in Russia” Comment: Racist slur?
Beatle Fab Four 23:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DLX 03:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-06-10 Podilsko-Voskresenska Line. --Kuban Cossack 17:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please try not to get too many people involved that didn't come across the issue accidentally. I want the issue to be resolved by people who are interested in it, and not by people who were invited. Nothing personal against Alex Bakharev, of course. — Alex(U|C|E) 00:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alex, can you please let me know when you unprotect the Başkale article. I only wish to do a cleanup on it -- am not involved on either side of any of the debates surrouding it. Thanks! Donama 03:56, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It complements the article so nicely :) --Alexia Death 08:10, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alex, could I do anything to persuade Ghirlandajo not to come to my User talk anymore politely? Colchicum 11:46, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Could you help come up with an NPOV title for this article: [[17]].
What about something like "Iran (newspaper) cartoon controversy" (This will match the title of a similar article: Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy Which also has the name of the paper). The current title is highly POV. A) It was one cartoon, not multiple cartoons, B) It was percieved as being Anti-Azerbaijani, not that it was necessarily meant to be anti-Azerbaijani, these are the two major problems with the current title.Hajji Piruz 17:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 24 | 11 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:10, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We have a revert war going on at Aleksander Brückner. One party is an anonymous IP who despite repeated requests refuses to get a login, making constructive discussion very difficult as the IP fluctuates from time to time. Could you please take a look? I think the best way to stop this mess would be to semi-protect the article, but as one of the parties to the revert war I could of course be wrong. Please make your own decision here. Balcer 17:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to bother you, but since you edited the article Russians in Ukraine, I was wondering if you have an opinion on the serious violation of the WP:POINT there[18]. I'd like to hear your opinion about it before I file it on the ANB. Thanks in advance. --Hillock65 17:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The members of WikiProject Oregon have finished using the current list based on Category:Oregon created by your bot. We think it would be good to ask you to run the bot occasionally by request hereafter--let us know if that works for you. If you'd like to not have it on one of your subpages we could make it a subpage of WPOR. Thanks to your bot, WPOR has added approximately 1000 articles to our lists and this has helped us implement our assessment program as well. Right now we would like you to run your bot run again in the same way (find anything in the Category:Oregon category tree that has not already been tagged with {{WikiProject Oregon}}), so we can have the list for reference, then we will ask you to run the bot again once in a while. If possible, we would like the bot to ignore these categories, which generate a bunch of false positives: Category:Amtrak, Category:Hudson's Bay Company, Category:Intel, Category:Nike, Inc., Category:Cascade Range, Category:Oregon Trail, Category:Modoc War, Category:Religious culture of the Pacific Northwest, Category:Columbia River, Category:Snake River, Category:BNSF Railway, Category:Burlington Northern Railroad, Category:Northern Pacific Railway, Category:Southern Pacific Railroad, and Category:Union Pacific Railroad. No hurry, as it appears you are on Wikibreak, but if you get a chance to do this, please leave a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Oregon. Thanks again for your great bot! Your other Oregon list has been a great help! Katr67 18:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WPOR Award: Sponsored in part by the Big Gold Dude. | ||
You are hereby granted this shiny object for all your hard work at WikiProject Oregon! For helping us complete our tagging project, and also for User:AlexNewArtBot/OregonSearchResult, which helps us keep track of all things Oregon. Huzzah! Katr67 19:06, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply] |
pls. look [[19]]. this is what I wrote you - again reverts by Hajji Piruz meatpuppets. Pls. also comment on RfC further. It seems we have reached something but Hajji Piruz and his Co. try to destroy it.--Dacy69 19:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC) also please look at this picture which Hajji Piruz is trying to insert in the page with his comments [20]. then I believe pictures of demonstration should be also inserted in the page. I would appreciate of you could comment on that as well.--Dacy69 19:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Could you summuraize your proposal at Iranian Azerbaijan. My quote of your proposal was not accepted. Editors will only accept one made by yourslef.Thanks.--Dacy69 16:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding this message I respectively disagree with your judgment. You are making a decision on behalf of Irpen on which images he likes, and which he does not. There are similar (while politically opposite) images on his talk page, and my point was to present to him the wider spectr of opinions. I don't mind if he removes the image and ask not to put such images any more, it's his choice after all, not yours. You fail to explain why in your judgment the image I inserted is vandalism, but the image right above the one I inserted is not (especially given the recent religious-like craziness that has been observed here on May 9).--Novelbank 22:16, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Wouldnt you say that this title "Iran (newspaper) cockroach cartoon controversy" is more accurate than the current title "Azeri Cartoon Controversy in "Iran" Newspaper".
"Iran (newspaper) cockroach cartoon controversy" would also match the title of a similar article Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy, wouldnt you agree?Hajji Piruz 03:31, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have nominated for deletion my compendium of Petri Krohn's weird ideas. Your nomination is clearly baseless. Please withdraw. Digwuren 06:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to say thanks to you for this page. I recently stumbled across it and have been using it to find/categorize/expand new chemistry articles. --Ed (Edgar181) 18:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, thanks for putting some protection up on the Rose Bowl Game page, I've been reverting vanaslism on that page for far too long, now it hopefully won't need it anyomre. Thanks again!
Alexdragon 05:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I really got offended by this edit, [21] [22] what I have done that resulted in this ad-herring and his attempts to brought the dangerous political war in WP and mentioning it again and again and again in any comments he make; and trying to make the other users to "react".--Pejman47 12:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pejman, I am really sorry you are offended but in my opinion Atabek's contributions to discussions were not of the sort that warrants administrative actions. Atabek, thanks for removing the most controversial part of your edit. Please in future keep cool then the editing gets hot. People has different thickness of skin and we do not want to offend anybody.
Regarding AI, I agree that sometimes it is biased. Still it is very influential organization and their opinions are much more often correct than incorrect. I think we could not blankly ignore their statements. We could say According to Amnesty International... Regarding the Grey Wolves picture, we cannot use a pictorial evidence by itself. We live in the age of photoshop and manipulative photography. Thus the photograph is only acceptable if the connection to GW is made by a reliable or notable source (in the second case it should be an attributed opinion) Alex Bakharev 01:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding your comment [24], I believe the article should reflect the name Azeri or Azerbaijani, not just due to the nature of cartoon, but due to the content of response reaction to it, which was offense taken by Azerbaijanis in particular. It applies directly to the word controversy rather than just cartoon. Thanks. Atabek 23:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Guys, I am not an expert in the cartoon story. In fact I have learnt it from you about it a few days ago. Maybe you can formally file a WP:RM and see the result? Alex Bakharev 01:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You must also log blocks here by listing the persons name so the arbcom admins can keep track of how many times a certain user has been blocked since the arbcom: [27] Thanks.Hajji Piruz 17:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As you proposed Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Digwuren/Petri Krohn's Story of Estonians as attack page then I thought to ask what is your opinion of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Petri Krohn/Evidence as that article accuses other users in wide variety of things, from bad faith to holocaust denial. Is such thing allowed?--Staberinde 15:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your interest in topics regarding the Baltic republics and the Soviet occupation. This interests has undoubtedly familiarised you with tactics and behaviour of Petri Krohn.
I have prepared a thorough overview of these tactics, along with references to related Wikipedia policy, and posted it to his userpage, requesting that he stop such activities, especially representing private alternative histories on Wikipedia as thought they were fact.
Unfortunately, he proceeded to delete the request mere seven minutes later, along with an inflammatory edit summary. I do not believe this to have been a proper reaction.
Please, if that will not be too inconvenient, take a look at the situation, evaluate it, and consider expressing your evaluation in the appropriate manner.
Many thanks, Digwuren 16:36, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I opened Arbcom page. please make your comments. [28] --Dacy69 15:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I droped your name from the list. Formally there is nothing wrong from your side though you could check also AlexanderPar edit war on the same page.--Dacy69 20:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Did you know? was updated. On 18 June, 2007, a fact from the article Iran newspaper cockroach cartoon controversy, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 15:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 25 | 18 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am here on User:Anonimu's behalf. He decide not to approach you directly because he fears further harassment from some users. The question: Is User:Biruitorul's description of him killing User:Anonimu an accepted thing on Wikipedia? User:Anonimu thinks this is equivalent to a death threat, but he would like to know the opinion of an Administrator before appealing to an Wikipedia procedure. Please reply on my Talk pageordirectly to User:Anonimu, using Wikipedia's e-mailing system. Baltaci 10:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not, it is not revert. We don't count any previous piece of wording as a revert. Moreover, this reference is already present in the text. Plus - this text was removed because some objected to one word in this text - I rephrased it. Generally, if you are watching so closely the page you shoud have noticed that other editors reintroduced the text several times. Have you counted how much Hajji Piruz who is also on revert parole re-deleted and re-introduced text in this article. Besides, as you can see there is obvious edit warring on the part of editors like Houshyar, Alborz. And for that Wikipedia do not require to wait for 3rr rule. people can be blocked for that as well without even making 3 reverts per day. The treatment shoud be fair and balanced.--Dacy69 13:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, my edit was deleted anyway by Houshyar. he is deleting everything which I insert. So, therefore I filed Arbcom case. The situation is like I am banned, because whatever edit I made they delete it and had no punishment for that. I hope Arbcom will sort out everything.--Dacy69 14:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
how much reverts and partial deletion should be made on this page by user:AlexanderPar to get admin attention [29]--Dacy69 16:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You might be interested to know that Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Petri Krohn has been filed. Digwuren 20:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Arequest for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Podilsko-Voskresenska Line, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. — Alex(U|C|E) 02:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alex Bakharev, can you please, provide diffs for your claim about "Some of the articles' histories shows similar sock blocked "as sockpuppets ot User:Atabek" here [30]. Also, I would like to draw attentions to this diff [31] as well as accusation made earlier [32], with an apology provided afterwards [33]. Thanks. Atabek 07:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to bother you, but you are the only admin I know more or less. I am having trouble with the Battle of Konotop article. User: Russianname keeps spamming it with NPOV tags, new reasons come up as soon as the old ones are cleared away. Right now he doesn't like Russian historian Sergey Solovyov and insists I exclude him. That is unacceptable, I included evidence from multiple sources and believe excluding some, is unjustified. I filed another MedCab case but was hoping you could clear this situation before it evolves into weeks of mediation. Thanks in advance. --Hillock65 18:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please, look into this diff [34]. It took me some time to work on this article, and find all references, and then User:Houshyar appears and reverts me without any explanation or comment, removing references to articles, books, etc. Can you please, help to mediate on this page or somehow explain the user that he needs to discuss. He is making use of the fact that I am limited by 1RR and he is not. And this kind of behavior is really disruptive and makes it pretty much impossible to make any valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Atabek 23:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Alex Bakharev,
Would you be so kind as to have a look at my article titled "Destructive creativity"? It was placed on DYK , then nominated to AfD. I don't know people, albeit I am attuned to comments, made some updates, and still need help. Your attention is highly appreciated.
Sincerely,Steveshelokhonov 01:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure how to report this formally: The same user who attacked Rose Bowl Game under multiple IPs and prompted you to semiprotect the page is now editing under a registered account as Beardownaz9. Can you advise me as to the best way of dealing with a user bent on persistent vandalism? Thanks. ~ João Do Rio 05:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi ! I do need your help to keep that image! I'm not familiar with Wiki's roles, but that image is really important. Here goes a discussion for deleting it. Can you help?
Thankyou so much ! --Alborz Fallah 08:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
ARequest for Mediation to which you are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Podilsko-Voskresenska Line.
|
Dear Alex, I am sorry to bother you, but the ethnicity/nationality/race problem continues [35] and seems to be an old one (see e.g. [36]), while the category description clearly states "by nationality", by ethnicity at best, but certainly not by race. Are such edits ok? If no, is there anything to prevent this? I don't know how many articles have been affected.
There are also some problems with Estonian SSR. Is it ok for some users to revert 12 kb+ of sourced information? I have always thought that burden of representing a point of view in Wikipedia should be on its holder, but now I see that some contributors prefer to delete other sourced POVs rather than to add something else. Colchicum 11:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alex, I think it was a wrong decision to unblock a proven sock account of User:Pam55. It was an account used for edit warring only. I do not object to lifting the ban from Behmod on a condition that he is strictly warned not to use socks or meats anymore. Grandmaster 04:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Maxwell diagram.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Pekaje 18:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Pekaje 18:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kelvin diagram.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Pekaje 18:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Pekaje 18:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. There seems to be another sock puppet created: [39]Hajji Piruz 20:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Atabek (talk · contribs) has broken his parole.
Here is where I took out information not related to Yeprem Khan, but rather belong in Sattar Khans article (if you look in the Sattar Khan article you will see that the information is there): [40]
1st revert (Atabek reinserted it): [41]
Naharar added a statement: [42]
2nd revert (Atabek took it out): [43]
Well, I'm pretty sure I know whats going to happen next (Atabek is probably going to come here also and make his usual comments and false accusations) so I probably wont engage him here. Just wanted to report his parole violation to you.Hajji Piruz 21:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've left a question on User talk:AlexNewArtBot. Separately, what art the puposes of these logs and their points? Simply south 18:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Alex. If you have some free time, could you please add a feed for new articles related to Syria for WikiProject Syria to your new articles bot? If you need anything specific from me, please leave me a message and I will provide it for you ASAP. Thanks, Anas talk? 19:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Food_for_3d_army.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 02:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Pavel_Litvinov.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 02:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have tagged Image:Tretyak.gifas{{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Abu badali (talk) 03:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Inauguration12.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 03:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Litvinenko1_858_1164855320.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 03:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 26 | 25 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, on WP:PUI, you stated that the photographer was willing to license this under the GFDL. Could you please forward the email correspondence to OTRS? Thanks. howcheng {chat} 19:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Alex Bakharev. You are off to such a great start on the article Soviet Census (1937) that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. Appearing on the Main Page would help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. Again, great job on the article. -- Jreferee (Talk) 20:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi!
Could you solve the problem from the article of Ruslana. Someone deleted 70% of it. Can you revert the page back and calm down the user 'Imprevu'?
Thank you!
AlexNewArtBot GoodLog appears to be blank. Can you take a look at this please? Also, for the DYK good log, is it possible to further screen out articles that have less than four footnotes? -- Jreferee (Talk) 20:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am again going to revert those edits, per WP:SPAM
Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam. Although the specific links may be allowed under some circumstances, repeatedly adding links will in most cases result in all of them being removed.
Therefore, I am asking you to take part in the discussion on WT:WPSPAM#http:.2F.2Fspam.iranica.com and discuss the link-additions to these pages, where it was spammed onto, first on the talkpages of these pages. Kind regards, --Dirk Beetstra T C 07:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alex, пытаюсь внести в эти статьи секцию "Prehistory", в которой даю материал по истории территорий, на которой разворачивались события Разделов Польши и Советско-Польской войны 1919-1920. Пишу о том, что это были территории Киевской Руси, а затем русских княжеств, которые только после татаро-монгольского нашествия стали переходить под власть Польши и Литвы, а затем оказались в составе объединенной Речи Посполитой в 16 веке. Даю ссылку на классическую『историю России с древнейших времен』Сергея Соловьева. Так нет же, польские участники стирают всё полностью. И дескать средневековой истории не надо, и Сергей Соловьев - старый источник. И слово Russian по отношению к Киевской руси нельзя применять, только Ruthenian. И вообще откровенно пользуются численностью. Что делать?Ben-Velvel 16:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for adding the feed, Alex. Much appreciated, mate. Best wishes, Anas talk? 14:34, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On1 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Soviet Census (1937), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 16:30, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Alex! Thanks for a very interesting article! regards, Odengatan 19:55, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Bakharev, you are known to be extremly supportive to User:Kuban kazak when he is crying of being (in his opinion) "stalked". Given your previous involvement, please be capable to explain that it's insolence to squeal about being "stalked", and "stalk" others in the same time, as he just did at Template:Ukraine Labelled Map.
More importanly, in my opinion it would be valuable for the project if you explaint to your friend that wikistalking constitites "an act of following users around in order to harass them". There is no indication of User:Akhristov following User:Kuban kazak in order to harass him. However, accusing others of wikistalking without merit does constitute harrassement. --Novelbank 21:17, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am going to visit my relatives in Russia and will be back on July 19 |
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 27 | 2 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can you pay attention here [44], the user removed sourced material from two legitimate scholarly sources. Thanks. Atabek 07:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have studied in a Soviet university in Poland and worked in one.
Thank you for your support regarding the integration, but my article was finally deleted as a whole and I don't have even a copy of it. Xx236 10:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]