Sir I could like to know the source of information which is the base of your article about the Pal
dynasty of Pal-lahara
Hello, Amshpatten, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, visit the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 14:27, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. You are deleting sourced information as well as adding unsourced. Your personal understanding of a subject is not a reason to make such changes. Doug Weller talk 14:27, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello I reverted your edit because I would like to ask if you could include the citation on Ahom script, where it says that it descends directly from Old Mon script, and not from Pyu>Burmese (or Old Mon). I do not have access to the source you are using so I can't look it up myself. In the paper 'The Mon Paradigm and the Origins of the Burma Script' (https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1wn0qs1.10?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents), it is explained in numerous ways how Burmese script must have descended from Pyu and not Old Mon. Looking at the location of the Old Mon kingdom compared to the the Hukawng Valley, where the Ahom people migrated to from China and then to Assam, it seems quite unlikely that their script descends from Old Mon directly. Does your source explain this? Glennznl ([[User talk:Glennzn
Hello Amshpatten, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Gaudi script have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, your sources on Odia script are not cited correctly. You can easily cite the correct way by clicking the cite-button while editing, then selecting a template and filling in the form. Could you fix the references on Odia script? Thanks. Glennznl (talk) 19:53, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boudh district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sambalpuri.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Desia Odia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 09:12, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
|
Hello, Amshpatten! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:19, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
Hi Amshpatten! I want to help you to expand Draft:Desia Odia so we can have it in main space. I am not very familiar with the languages of the area, and there is one thing which I don't quite understand yet fully: according to Glottolog, Kotia and Desia are same, while in Ethnologue, they are listed separately. Are these variants really distinct, or rather kept apart by SIL for socio-cultural reasons? If have followed Glottolog, and added a source that deals with "Kotia Odia". –Austronesier (talk) 20:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edittoParalakhemundi—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 08:01, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Konark, and several other articles, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 08:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to know that why did you added Takri to Garhwali page? There is no evidence for the usage of the script for Garhwali Language. Only Pahari languages of Himachal & Jammu & Kashmir, along with Kashtwari from Jammu & Kashmir & Jaunsari & Jaunpuri (at times considered as dialect of Garhwali for which separate wikipedia page exists) from Uttarahand were written using Takri script, that too of a very different variety (here is the proposal of unicode for that variety). Are you a speaker any Pahari language? If yes, the I would like you to contribute to the Swadesh list here. Nik9hil (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rangpuri language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assamese script.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit to Meitei script has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 11:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Odia grammar, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Zoodino (talk) 15:30, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
An article you recently created, Rona-Lee Shimon, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 17:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit to Navreh has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:49, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Navreh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lunar.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding this. Please note that there is a redundant table at Mizoram#Biodiversity. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit to Aka-Jeru language has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Amshpatten, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Kaundinya I have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 23:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I've noticed you started adding name reading templates to Japanese singers active in the K-pop industry, such as Sakura Miyawaki, Yukika Teramoto, Nako Yabuki, Hitomi Honda, and Juri Takahashi. I have removed Korean readings of their names from the lead of the articles; a Korean pronunciation for native Japanese names are not necessary especially if they are not Korean citizens. Feel free to discuss this on my talk page if they should be included. lullabying (talk) 04:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Category:Cambodian people of South Asian descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
The article Sujata Koirala (Nepali actress) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
None of the references pass WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. nirmal (talk) 07:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Panji. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 19#Panji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In short, the sources are reliable because they were self-published sources created by the person in the biography, which is Benjamin/Bald.
Please refer to my conversation with Nemov for more information. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nemov
This topic has already beed resolved, which I mentioned in the reversion notes, so you shouldn't have reverted my edit.
Kind regards, Unofficialwikicorrector (talk) 01:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Tosali. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 20:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a statement describing how copyright applies to Wikipedia, show that you understand our copyright policy, and make a commitment to follow it in the future.— Diannaa (talk) 20:11, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Amshpatten (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Regarding that particular article, I did modify sections from the source before putting it in the main article but I have erred very casually despite being aware of the Wikipedia copyright policy. I have gone through the Wikipedia:Copyrights and Wikipedia:Non-free content as notified to me. As per Wikipedia policy I understand the key policies and issues that governs it.
I understand that Wikipedia content can be copied, modified and redistributed if and only if the copied version is made available on the same terms to others and acknowledgment of the authors of the Wikipedia article used is included. Copied Wikipedia content will therefore remain free under an appropriate license and can continue to be used by anyone subject to certain restrictions, most of which aim to ensure that freedom.
I understand Never to use materials that infringe the copyrights of others as this could create legal liabilities and seriously hurt Wikipedia. If in doubt, write the content yourself, thereby creating a new copyrighted work which can be included in Wikipedia without trouble.- I hereby pledge to always keep this statement in mind henceforth whenever I think to editing here. I will always cite copyrighted works, keeping in mind the issues with copyright.
I love editing articles aided by evidences and proper references and hoped my efforts would contribute to the quality of articles, but it seems I have erred many times with respect to copyright. I hereby apologise for my silly carelessness and pledge to make the effort to always be careful while editing. I don't wish to be blocked as I want to contribute all I can to Wikipedia. I hereby make the commitment never to make the copyright mistake again, providing which I understand I will be blocked again indefintely. Amshpatten (talk) 20:36, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
Copyright is a serious issue and dealing with it sucks up a lot of editor time. Unblocks for CV issues should, in my opinion, only happen when the editor can convincingly demonstrate that they understand why copying copyrighted text is an issue and that it won't be done any more. With no response to Dianaaa's queries below for over two weeks, I'm not convinced. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Amshpatten opened. MER-C 16:29, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
