Please also note that Wikipedia is not the place to write based on one's own personal experience and knowledge: all content added here needs to be based on published sources. See WP:OR. – Uanfala (talk) 15:33, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, User AngelicDevil29, I have noticed you're contributions on tribe section of Sindhis and I have to say it is a work that is commendable, Please take my salute. happy contributings in advance! ⭐️ Starkex ⭐️ 📧 ✍️
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Sindhi Embroideries you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 19:46, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes i was about to do it, as the article is still unfinished, you told me last time but i forgot how to add attributions, should i edit it on the content or in reference list? And thank you for putting attributions. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 19:51, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I already added the attribution by including the template {{Creative Commons text attribution notice|cc=by4|from this source=yes}} at the end of the relevant citation. — Diannaa (talk) 19:57, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions to Sindhi Rajputs. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Langah (clan). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
This was your first cited source[1], and I can't see anywhere calling Langah as Sindhis. Second[2] mention Langha, not Langah tribe. Not to mention the publisher Cambridge Scholars Publishing is not
Moreover, Langahs are not found solely in Sindh. Unless you're willing to rephrase it as a Baloch, Sindhi and Punjabi tribe, it's against WP:NPOV to label it merely as Sindhi. Sutyarashi (talk) 17:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the first sources mentions the rajput tribes of Sindh in whivh Langah are mentioned, the second source uses langha spelling for Langah, due to their similar pronunciations.
Misrepresentation of sources. First mentions Langah of Multan, not "Rajput Langah of Sindh". And if Langah and Langha are same, why they have different articles? Sutyarashi (talk) 12:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
why are you removing the sourced content on Daudpotra, which of source is unreliable? Every source I cited mentions Daudpotra to be branch of Kalhora tribe.
And why is it even necessary to specify northwest of Sindh? perhaps they originally lived there, but presently they are present elsewhere in Sindh as well, Karachi and Hyderabad for example. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 19:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
^Nahyan, Mansoor Bin Tahnoon Al; Hussain, Jamal; Ghafoor, Asad ul (2019-05-09). Tribes of Pakistan. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 109. ISBN978-1-5275-3439-1.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Deepfriedokra:@331dot: just for a little background, AngelicDevil29 got indeffed as a result of this ANI discussion. Please have a look over their past unblock requests and block log as well. AngelicDevil29 was already given a chance to contribute constructively after previous block was lifted on 22 January, and they showed no improvement regarding the issues which lead to their first block. I have been going through the articles they had been heavily editing, and quite honestly, they are a mess. It is clear that AngelicDevil29 takes the WP guidelines as suggestions, which can be easily ignored or overridden. Unless it is expected from the community to waste even more of its time in educating them about Wikipedia principles, which they are not going to pay heed anyways (several examples there at ANI), and keep a track of what they edit, I don't see what possible benefit is in giving AngelicDevil29 a third chance. Sutyarashi (talk) 09:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]