Please stop copying and pasting articles from other web sites. Wikipedia's policy is to not use other's copyrighted materials. PLease use your opwn words!Malcolm Farmer 15:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Dead at 36, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}tothe top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 06:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Dead at 50, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}tothe top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 06:52, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Anjijoy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 876 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:17, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}tothe top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 16:24, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that your edits to Sisera's mother had been reverted - it must have been because it was unreferenced. What you added sounded very interesting, so if you can find a reliable source supporting your claim, it would definitely belong in the article. StAnselm (talk) 00:12, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edittoGeorge Chapman (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:04, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for creating Edward Theophilus Nelson, Anjijoy!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This has no sources and no indication of notability. Redirecting until there are sources to back up notability.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn (talk) 17:13, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your article Independent Order of St. Luke was not ready to be published, so it has been moved to Draft:Independent Order of St. Luke, where you can improve it by adding references, expanding the text and filling in the blanks in the infobox. When you are ready, you can submit the draft. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 15:20, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Anjijoy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Independent Order of St. Luke".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 14:27, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The article A Mug's Game has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable TV series
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. buidhe 16:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
