Contents

User talk:AnthonySorace

Hello, AnthonySorace, and welcometoWikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
• Always sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~ so others will know who left which comments.
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
• How to edit a page and write a great article
• The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
• The handy Manual of Style
• And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango123 14:36, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page. :)

Nice to see you around, and thanks for updating/fixing a bit some of the Plan 9 related pages, I have tried to keep them looking barely sane, but I don't really have much spare time(and I hate the wikipedia interface/language).

Lost Goblin 14:16, August 1, 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I have requested that the title for the article on James Braid be changed from the inappropriate, misleading, and historically incorrect current title of James Braid (physician) to the appropriate and historically correct title of James Braid (surgeon).

On the basis that you have contributed to the current article in some way, I thought that you should know that the article will be moving within 7 days from James Braid (physician) to the appropriate and correct title of James Braid (surgeon) unless there is widespread, informed, and fact-based objections.

It would be helpful if you could express your support for the correction of what seems to have been, originally, an inadvertent error, at site of the discussion of proposal. Thanks, in anticipation . . . Lindsay658 (talk) 09:36, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I saw you removed a portion of the Inferno OS page which references Ports, specifically the line mentioning rumors that Inferno provides the base functionality for the iPhone OS application environment. Your comment for the removal was, "Remove reference to obvious BS. This Inferno is not a screen saver." Two questions: did you misunderstand the text? It was not suggesting the iPhone screen in the blog post referenced was a screen saver at all, but possibly a boot loader of some sort according to the blog post. Also, can you refute the text claim that rumors surrounding Inferno on the iPhone exist and debunk the referenced source? 24.250.60.107 (talk) 03:20, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article cited as reference *only* talked about some software of vague description, which is clearly unrelated to the topic of the article. My commit comment probably shouldn't have said "screen saver", but that's beside the point. Unsubstantiated rumors are not reasonable sources of encyclopedic content. And, for course, even those aren't cited in the article. There's nothing to refute: even assuming the article's 100% accurate, the thing called Inferno there simply isn't the same bit of software the wikipedia article is about. AnthonySorace (talk) 02:10, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]