|
 |
Your recent edits have improved the article tremendously. Thanks so much for all your hard work! I am particularly impressed by your diligence adding inline citations (per Bluebook) in the article. In a perfect world, every article will include a footnote after every sentence formatted according to Bluebook ... your efforts are one step toward achieving that utopia. If you have any interest in editing articles about other SCOTUS cases, you may want to check out the SCOTUS article wikiproject. Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 23:16, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
The Law Barnstar | |
| Regardless of your edit-warring history, you've done a remarkably good job improving Obergefell v. Hodges. Thank you! -- Chamith (talk) 17:00, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
