Contents

User talk:Antonio B.1234

Hi Antonio B.1234! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at 2022 Florida gubernatorial election that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Fun Is Optional (talk) 03:17, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this information, I will use this knowledge when making edits in the future. Have a nice day. Antonio B.1234 (talk) 03:25, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edittoHenry McMaster—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 05:17, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was not experimenting, the source cited NEVER quoted Govenor McMaster saying he would impose a ban if the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Obergefell v. Hodges.

Instead, the source cited Govenor McMaster stating, “In our constitution, [gay marriage] it is not allowed, and under our state law, it is not allowed. I would follow state law, whatever state law is,” Mr. McMaster said. “Maybe I’m old-fashioned, but I think a marriage ought to be between a man and a woman.”

South Carolina never legalized same-sex marriage therefore if Obergefell v. Hodges were overturned, the ban would be automatic.

Please take your time before undoing changes to review sources and make sure they are accurate.

Unless you see something I don't please refrain from undoing my changes in the future. I will be undoing your change in efforts to make sure all information on Wikipedia is factual. Thank You. Antonio B.1234 (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's in the article: "I would follow state law." If it's banned, he would impose the ban, that's what following state law means. ... discospinster _talk 18:32, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let’s break this down, "I would follow state law.” Somehow equates to: “I’ll ban same-sex marriage if the Supreme Court overruns the case” that’s interesting logic. Antonio B.1234 (talk) 00:27, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with your disruptive editing as you did on Henry McMaster. I've added additional sources to sooth your confusion. Please read sources before deleting entire passages, or add additional sources to support the content. Dr. Blazer (talk) 20:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

when did I delete an entire passage? Antonio B.1234 (talk) 19:16, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mallory Horne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat Thomas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]