Contents

User talk:Arce123

HiArce123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edittoAustro-Turkish War (1788–1791)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. SunDawntalk 07:55, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Remember: Stop adding information in the article that is not backed by reliable sources. Coltsfan (talk) 12:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, i'd advise you to stop adding or changing information with no sources. All material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Per WP:UNSOURCED, "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material". You have been doing that repeatedly and was warned about this. If you choose not to change this behaviour, you might be blocked, per policy guidelines. I hope you reconsider, and take a good read at WP:V and WP:RS. Thanks for the attention, Coltsfan (talk) 14:12, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arce123,

Thank you for creating Austrian expedition against Morocco (1829).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article does not cite any source. More References are needed.

This article needs to satisfy general notability as given in WP:GNG
More sources are needed. Individual sources must be evaluated separately and independently of each other and meet the four criteria below to determine if a source qualifies towards establishing notability:

1. Contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.
2. Be completely independent of the article subject.
3. Meet the standard for being a reliable source.
4. Be a secondary source; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.
   

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 10:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arce123,

Thank you for creating Battle of Massa.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article DOES NOT CITE sources.

References are needed.
This article needs to satisfy general notability as given in WP:GNG
More sources are needed. Individual sources must be evaluated separately and independently of each other and meet the four criteria below to determine if a source qualifies towards establishing notability:

1. Contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.
2. Be completely independent of the article subject.
3. Meet the standard for being a reliable source.
4. Be a secondary source; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.
   

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 10:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Capture of the North Frisian Islands has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 15:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Austrian expedition against Morocco (1829) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet notability guidelines per WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 197.153.38.240 (talk) 14:40, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Battle of Procida (1809), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Modussiccandi (talk) 16:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to adequately present the sources used for the information in the article. Simply giving vague references to the tittle of a book is not sufficient. Have a look at WP:REF. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 16:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Bosnian border raids in the Austrian Empire, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 20:15, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arce123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Procida (1809), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:31, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arce123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Procida".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arce123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bosnian border raids in the Austrian Empire".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 07:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]