Thanks a lot for starting the article. Just to let you know in case you are not aware that there is a Ukraine Portal, particularly the Portal:Ukraine/New article announcements and Portal:Ukraine/Ukraine-related Wikipedia notice board. The New article announcements board is probably the most important and the most attended one. Please don't forget to announce there the new articles you create. Adding both boards to your watchlist is probably a good idea.
Finally, in case you are interested, similar boards exist at Russia portal as many editors contribute to topics related to both countries. The respective boards there are: Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. --Irpen 23:51, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for adding a picture to Rail transport in Belize! It was missing for a long time. Just a small doubt - is this really a former railroad bridge? On the first glance, it seems rather broad (wide) for a narrow-gauge banana railroad. It would also help if you could specify the exact location (e.g., across which river) - especially if you are still in Belize. Otherwise, thanks for the contribution - and we are looking for more! Sapfan 23:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am currently planning a trip to Kiev in May, 2007. I will spend a lot of time photographing Kiev's architecture and places of interest as well as random shots of daily city life. If you have any specific requests for your Wikipedia needs, please compile a list here, and I'll be more than happy to fulfill it. -asmadeus 20:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, actually, cc-by-sa-3.0 is better than 1.0, because 3.0 allows redistribution under not only "same or similar" license but "same, similar or compatible" license. In practice it may or may not mean in our case but why restrict usage if people come up with newer copyleft licenses? Copyleft is progress, isn't it? Thanks again.
Oh, and Kuban kazak, will probably ask you for Kiev Metro images. I will leave him a note. Cheers, --Irpen 00:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(please add your requests below)
Please note that some image sources already exist. See this thread. This may just spare you some work although if you would like to make a better image than there, this would always be great.
Also, I just added to the thread about another gallery I found. I meant this one. I think we will have a permission from them soon. The site's owner seems very friendly and accommodating. --Irpen 06:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On3 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article National Philharmonic Society of Ukraine, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--Majorly (o rly?) 19:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On4 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article National Art Museum of Ukraine, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--BigHaz - Schreit mich an 02:18, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]On5 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Museum of Western and Oriental Art, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
Thank you for your contribution! — ERcheck (talk) 05:05, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. Thanks for your prompt reply at Piano Concerto No. 1 (Liszt) to my request for a reference. Not having the book you used for a reference, but relying (perhaps unreliably) on a Google search, it seems that there are a multitude of stories, perhaps all apocryphal, as to the origin and intention of the phrase, "Das versteht Ihr alle nicht." Also, I just attended a lecture by a noted musicologist who attributed the quote to Hans von Bulow and implied that it was meant to be critical of Lizst; certainly Liszt would not have used the phrase as a compositional tool if that were true. So I guess my {{fact}} tag was meant more to suggest that we add to the article some of the differing stories as to how the phrase came to be associated to the concerto, rather than providing a reference that indicates only one author's version of the story. That is, unless the author you cited has specific evidence that discredits the many versions of the story and proves only the one given in the article. In truth, I am skeptical of Hamilton's claim: it seems unlikely that a composer would write a whole concerto around a funny phrase. As a joke, though, applied in retrospect, it seems more appropriate. (Of course, I have no evidence or source of my hunch!) If this needs more discussion, I'm happy to carry this over onto the article's talk page. Thanks! VectorPosse 09:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In regards to your claim that it is strictly POV, see http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/03/07/1343205. It was essentially around that time that the term was used on a regular basis.SarcasticDwarf 12:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I guess it isn't hard trance, I was going by discogs. What would you call it, since it's kinda between genres? --x1987x(talk) 03:15, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. It seems like you have an interest in ambient music. I wonder if you wouldn't mind taking a look at Space music when you get a chance. There is currently an ongoing issue there with one editor trying to suggest that space music is not a genre of ambient - and the discussion would certainly benefit from outside opinions by knowledgeable parties. --Gene_poole 07:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please join to Electronic art music disuccion talk! I will support you --Susume-eat 05:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC) Now here: [[1]][reply]