:D -ParalysedBeaver 14:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please have a look at the latest corrective edit regarding the 4,000 civilian casualties. I have ask this editor to provide a verifiable source to justify the figure.
If you read further into the edit I made, including the links, you will see that there is now a verifiable and trustworthy source for the lower numbers I have quoted.
As you can see, this type of re-edit has happened regularly over the years :
> 7 May 2019 86.241.175.56 talk 18,951 bytes -33 Reverted to pre-vandalism numbers. > 5 May 2019 Richard Tennant talk contribs 18,984 bytes +1,168 revised civilian casualties
> 23 September 2015 Crystallizedcarbon talk contribs m 16,759 bytes +24 Reverted edits by 163.1.19.1 (talk) (HG) > 23 September 2015 163.1.19.1 talk 16,735 bytes -24 Muir's biography of Wellington (p456) says that the highest estimate of civilian deaths at Badajoz is 100, so `massacred 4000 civilians' seems inaccurate.
> 5 January 2015 83.113.239.186 talk 15,494 bytes +4 restored numbers from before british revisionism > 7 December 2014 83.47.32.151 talk 15,490 bytes -9 The troops killed between 100 and 200 Spanish civilians, otherwise they would have masscred the entire population of Badajoz, which at the time had less than 5,000 inhabitants.
> 14 July 2014 Ruddah talk contribs 15,007 bytes -10 Undid revision 616926361 by 2.138.12.241 (talk) > 14 July 2014 2.138.12.241 talk 15,017 bytes +10 I have changed the number of Spanish civilians killed by the troops. > 13 July 2014 Ruddah talk contribs 15,007 bytes +1 Undid revision 616831566 by 2.138.12.241 (talk) > 13 July 2014 2.138.12.241 talk 15,006 bytes -1 I have changed the number of Spanish civilians killed after Badajoz was taken.
Many thanks Richard Tennant (talk) 09:10, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the WP:DRN regarding I cited a past argument that you made. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Steak and Blowjob Day".The discussion is about the topic Steak and Blowjob Day. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! ItsGolfTime (talk) 21:58, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
