Contents

User talk:Avicennasis/MainArchive/2016Q2

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

← 2016Q1 |

2016Q2

| 2016Q3 →

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

• Draft:MotiveInteractive

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Avicennasis. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Shailesh Thaker".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 04:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

• Draft:Geometric set

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Can you or the relevant person please let me know why was my article on Moundadan Chetty language deleted? It had all the valid references. It is a separate language similar to Badaga and Kannada. If Kwami considers it not to be a separate language which has ISO request reference and a detailed case study also as references, what else is it? A dialect of some known language? What are the valid references with user to prove this? Please enlighten me. Thanks!–NitinBhargava2016 (talk) 02:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

The ISO request was rejected. That's unusual for a request submitted by Ethnologue. Unfortunately the paper giving the reasons for rejection is no longer online. I'll see if I can find out what happened. — kwami (talk) 02:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

They rejected it for lack of evidence that it's linguistically and not just geographically distinct from Wayanad Chetti, and requested that the proposal be resubmitted with evidence. If it cannot demonstrated that it's a distinct language, they recommend adding it to Wayanad Chetti [ctt] and changing the name of [ctt] to just "Chetti". — kwami (talk) 00:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

• Draft:Gordon Graham

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.