Contents

User talk:BaderMS

Hello, BaderMS, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your nameontalk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Bompanigcc (talk) 02:34, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your support, Bompanigcc

BaderMS (talk) 05:11, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BaderMS. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BaderMS/King Abdullah International Conference Center, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BaderMS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "King Abdullah International Conference Center".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Liz. Certainly, I will adhere to the policies regarding the draft article. BaderMS (talk) 09:00, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greenhouse gas emissions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nuclear. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. BaderMS (talk) 18:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Energy transition

added links pointing to Shell and SSE

International Atomic Energy Agency

added a link pointing to Nuclear energy

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BaderMS. In your edit here, you say you've added a "cited paragraph". But you didn't! There's no reference at all for the paragraph. Can you please add one ASAP? MeegsC (talk) 11:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you MeegsC for bringing this to my attention. The citation has been added. BaderMS (talk) 12:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! MeegsC (talk) 12:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited World Trade Organization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CHF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. BaderMS (talk) 19:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BaderMS, I am a bit puzzled and concerned about your recent edits. I noticed them in a few articles that I am watching. It seems that you have a certain pattern: you add a new (often long) paragraph from some publication to a Wikipedia article with one new citation. Several times, I have reverted that now for various reasons. E.g. often it's too detailed for a high-level article (like at greenhouse gas emissions, see here) Or it uses too much jargon or UN speech. Not written in encyclopedic language. Or the page number is missing for a long report.

Could you please explain to me (or on your user page) what your intentions and editing goals are, just so that I know where you are coming from? It almost seems like you have a long list of publications in front of you, and you work through that list one by one and then decide which Wikipedia article you can add certain content to. Rather than looking at the Wikipedia article, checking what it needs, where the gaps are and so forth.

Also keep in mind this policy: WP:NOTNEWS. (not all verifiable events are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). I would encourage you to rather work with the existing content than just blindly adding additional paragraphs from new publications to loads of articles. EMsmile (talk) 21:14, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reaching out. I appreciate your efforts in maintaining the quality of Wikipedia articles.

Since 2022, I have been an active Wikipedia editor, primarily in Arabic, where I've created over 390 articles and am recognized as a top 500 user. My contributions have earned me several badges, including The 2023 Cure Award for being one of the top medical editors. More details are available on my user page. Several months ago, I shifted my focus to editing in English to enhance future translations. My updates are based on the news that is regularly released in the media, and I am actively involved in enhancing some pages by filling in missing information or updating their data. While I strive to ensure accuracy and relevance, I perhaps overlook details such as page numbers. I view this as an area where feedback from experienced editors like you is invaluable.

Thank you for your guidance. I am committed to continuous improvement and ensuring my edits align with Wikipedia's best practices. BaderMS (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for these explanations. Sounds like you're doing fabulous work on the Arabic Wikipedia, well done! If you enjoy adding up to date data and information to the English Wikipedia, I suggest you pick the kinds of articles that benefit most from additional data. For example, we have a bunch of articles on "climate change in country X" (see listing here). Those would be highly in need of updated figures. Also e.g. the little group of articles on "greenhouse gas emissions in country X", see this listing.

But then there are others that are more about methods and concepts, like carbon footprint, carbon accounting. Those ones don't really benefit from having arbitrary new data added to them, especially not from primary studies. They will otherwise just become longer and longer over time, and people will get lost in detail. If you want to add new content, you may also consider which existing content ought to be condensed or replaced, in order to avoid length creep (for articles that are already on the long side).

Please also participate in the WikiProject Climate Change if you're interesting in the climate change topic. You're very welcome! EMsmile (talk) 09:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your valuable advice, given your extensive experience. I will definitely take it into consideration moving forward. I plan to review the pages you mentioned and might even participate in the WikiProject Climate Change. BaderMS (talk) 14:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, please add attribution when copying from public domain sources: simply add the template {{source-attribution}} as part of your citation. I have done so for the above article. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself, and that it's okay to copy verbatim. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 13:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll do that in the future. BaderMS (talk) 18:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Solar-powered pump has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message and for bringing this to my attention. I have reviewed your note regarding the removal of my edit to the Solar-powered pump article due to copyright concerns. I have reached out to the copyright holder, Yale Environment 360, and I am currently awaiting their response. Once I receive their feedback, I will ensure that any content used adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. I appreciate your guidance and will act accordingly based on the response from Yale Environment 360. Thank you for your understanding and for maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia. BaderMS (talk) 14:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I received an approval email from the copyright holder (dated June 21, Yale e360 - Jeremy) to use excerpts. If there is any important and relevant informationinYale e360, it will be used to enhance the articles using my words, following the guidelines. Thank you. BaderMS (talk) 15:26, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't copy any of their work into Wikipedia at this time. The permission email has to be sent to our volunteer response team (not to you) using the instructions already provided. It's okay to add content in your own words though if you like. — Diannaa (talk) 14:53, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have referred the copyright holder to read Wikipedia: Declaration of consent for all enquiries and to send the permission email to the VRT address as instructed. Thanks. BaderMS (talk) 15:36, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you are adding many energy-details to articles, is this detail of interest: [1] ? VanBuren (talk) 12:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. It might be suitable for the "Solar power in China" article. I will review the details and the source provided, in accordance with the guidelines. BaderMS (talk) 13:47, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]