Contents

User talk:BarleyButt

Hello, BarleyButt!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Timothytyy (talk) 12:30, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see you've added {{Unreferenced section}} tags throughout. Even if technically correct, it strikes me that this really isn't necessary: the existing {{more footnotes}} tag already covers the entire article, while making the additional point that there are sources included, just not footnoted. To reduce clutter in what is quite a short article I'm therefore inclined to remove the section tags again, but wanted first to explain why I was doing so. Best, Ingratis (talk) 09:04, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, that makes sense. Thanks for letting me know. BarleyButt (talk) 17:58, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware of the following consensus: WP:KIEV/WP:KYIV. Thanks. Mellk (talk) 22:17, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I do not see how my edits are against consensus: this is not unambiguously historical in the same way that the Kiev OffensiveorKievan Rus' are, but I don't feel strongly enough to discuss this at length on the article page. BarleyButt (talk) 22:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the following rule of thumb for determining what is current or historical which is 1991/95. Mellk (talk) 22:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]