Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Talk:Selena Gomez. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:12, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The information is poorly referenced as its from this site! BTW read the rules the talk pages DO NOT REQUIRE referencing! Call it contraversial its still a fact.--Biebersbro (talk) 07:18, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK so dumped the must be referneced excuse since I pointed out that was rubbish and not in the rules, so now going with the "contentious allegations" card?
I do like the way you refused to answer my question and just deleted it, why justify somthing when you can just make it dissapear.--Biebersbro (talk) 07:32, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| Gogo Dodo (talk) 12:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
Hi. Please do not add unsourced material, original research or your own personal opinions to articles, as you did with your edits to the Ray Comfort article here and here. The standard for inclusion of material in articles, particularly of a controversial nature is not "truth", but Verifiability. Wikipedia requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. Wikipedia's Neutrality Policy forbids editors from adding their own personal opinions or observations to articles. If you have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 12:05, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
