Contents

User talk:Blaue Max

Please check my talk page where I was told to go in order to "try" to change the Eiffel Tower picture....

I was told to discuses it on the talk page. MonsieurNapoléon (talk) 19:37, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blaue Max - Going thru my list of contributions for the past couple of days, and further back to last June if you have time - like all the way to next Christmas-, might give you an idea of what to expect at the Louis XVI article.

Best regards, --Blue Indigo (talk) 11:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same person, under different signature, just contributed to this edit at Chartres article, [1]

It is its 4th user's name, three having been created since 12 August.

--Blue Indigo (talk) 14:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mjroots (talk) 18:04, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis De Geer (1587–1652), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walloon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Russian Armed Forces and List of Russian military bases abroad, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please note that, while you can produce and keep WP:OR maps on WikiCommons, they are not to be used in articles. The Russian military bases 2015.png map you've introduced to the content of both articles does not meet WP:RSorWP:NPOV as it depicts the Russian Federation as including Crimea and other disputed territories/states without any deference to their being disputed territories. Please do not try to introduce any more WP:POV content again. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there's a ongoing discussion at Talk:American Revolutionary War about if the Anglo-French War (1778–83) should exist. As you contributed to the article maybe you're interested. SuffrenXXI (talk) 02:27, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I started a discussion about ledes in general. I invite you to this. --George Ho (talk) 06:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited French invasion of Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Smolensk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your note 'unexplained removal of sourced infos' is incorrect - I merely added links, where the article was deficient, and corrected misspelling. I also moved the Assassination paragraph to flow more logically - perhaps that is the source of confusion. Please review text and revert to the improved version. PLawrence99cx (talk) 20:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited French conquest of Algeria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bombardment of Algiers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to invite you to participate in the discussion of the article, where doubts have been raised regarding the relevance of some information that you contributed to the article. Thanks. --Jan Winnicki * 18:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Thank you for all of the work you've done on and about Wikipedia's French collection and pages. Of course other editors can only approximately feel what each of us have done on Wikipedia, and you yourself are the only one who knows how much quality material and work you've added or protected. But, from the little I've looked at page histories, I sense you've done a lot. Thank you again. Randy Kryn 17:11, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mistral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--John (talk) 01:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Would you take a look at the many new additions on the Paris tourism template to see if all of them are relevant and listed correctly. Maybe too many to dig through one by one but might be needed (already removed tangential-dictionary-type links in the section heads). Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:06, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:30, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Following this ANI discussion, your user page has been deleted. Please read the discussion and the relevant guideline regarding user pages. Favonian (talk) 17:30, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]