J u m p t o c o n t e n t
M a i n m e n u
M a i n m e n u
N a v i g a t i o n
● M a i n p a g e ● C o n t e n t s ● C u r r e n t e v e n t s ● R a n d o m a r t i c l e ● A b o u t W i k i p e d i a ● C o n t a c t u s ● D o n a t e
C o n t r i b u t e
● H e l p ● L e a r n t o e d i t ● C o m m u n i t y p o r t a l ● R e c e n t c h a n g e s ● U p l o a d f i l e
S e a r c h
Search
A p p e a r a n c e
● C r e a t e a c c o u n t ● L o g i n
P e r s o n a l t o o l s
● C r e a t e a c c o u n t ● L o g i n
P a g e s f o r l o g g e d o u t e d i t o r s l e a r n m o r e ● C o n t r i b u t i o n s ● T a l k
( T o p )
1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 2 0
2 B o b b y j i m 2 2 , y o u a r e i n v i t e d t o t h e T e a h o u s e !
T o g g l e t h e t a b l e o f c o n t e n t s
U s e r t a l k : B o b b y j i m 2 2
A d d l a n g u a g e s
P a g e c o n t e n t s n o t s u p p o r t e d i n o t h e r l a n g u a g e s .
● U s e r p a g e ● T a l k
E n g l i s h
● R e a d ● E d i t ● A d d t o p i c ● V i e w h i s t o r y
T o o l s
T o o l s
A c t i o n s
● R e a d ● E d i t ● A d d t o p i c ● V i e w h i s t o r y
G e n e r a l
● W h a t l i n k s h e r e ● R e l a t e d c h a n g e s ● U s e r c o n t r i b u t i o n s ● U s e r l o g s ● V i e w u s e r g r o u p s ● U p l o a d f i l e ● S p e c i a l p a g e s ● P e r m a n e n t l i n k ● P a g e i n f o r m a t i o n ● G e t s h o r t e n e d U R L ● D o w n l o a d Q R c o d e
P r i n t / e x p o r t
● D o w n l o a d a s P D F ● P r i n t a b l e v e r s i o n
A p p e a r a n c e
F r o m W i k i p e d i a , t h e f r e e e n c y c l o p e d i a
your contributions to Wikipedia . I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, North Pole, Alaska . While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page . If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles , nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk ) 17:00, 14 December 2020 (UTC) [ reply ]
North Pole, Alaska . Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted . If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox . Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges . Xstoe (talk ) 17:03, 14 December 2020 (UTC) [ reply ]
disruptive editing . If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to North Pole, Alaska , you may be blocked from editing . Materialscientist (talk ) 17:04, 14 December 2020 (UTC) [ reply ]
How did i disruptive edit? I just added a minor edit.
[ edit ]
Hi Bobbyjim22 ! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. the Teahouse ! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar talk ).
We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot Teahouse hosts
16:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
R e t r i e v e d f r o m " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bobbyjim22&oldid=1044329462 " H i d d e n c a t e g o r y : ● W i k i p e d i a n s w h o h a v e r e c e i v e d a T e a h o u s e i n v i t a t i o n
● T h i s p a g e w a s l a s t e d i t e d o n 1 4 S e p t e m b e r 2 0 2 1 , a t 1 7 : 5 0 ( U T C ) . ● T e x t i s a v a i l a b l e u n d e r t h e C r e a t i v e C o m m o n s A t t r i b u t i o n - S h a r e A l i k e L i c e n s e 4 . 0 ;
a d d i t i o n a l t e r m s m a y a p p l y . B y u s i n g t h i s s i t e , y o u a g r e e t o t h e T e r m s o f U s e a n d P r i v a c y P o l i c y . W i k i p e d i a ® i s a r e g i s t e r e d t r a d e m a r k o f t h e W i k i m e d i a F o u n d a t i o n , I n c . , a n o n - p r o f i t o r g a n i z a t i o n . ● P r i v a c y p o l i c y ● A b o u t W i k i p e d i a ● D i s c l a i m e r s ● C o n t a c t W i k i p e d i a ● C o d e o f C o n d u c t ● D e v e l o p e r s ● S t a t i s t i c s ● C o o k i e s t a t e m e n t ● M o b i l e v i e w
Hello, and thank you for your contributionstoWikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, North Pole, Alaska. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:00, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at North Pole, Alaska. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Xstoe (talk) 17:03, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edittoNorth Pole, Alaska, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 17:04, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
