Contents

User talk:Bobschops

Hello, Bobschops, and welcome to Wikipedia!

To get started, click on the link that says "welcome".

I (and the rest of us here, too!) hope you like it here and decide to stay!

Good luck and happy editing! Lazulilasher (talk) 02:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is no one speaking to you? So .... hello.

I stopped by to say St Mary's Church, Derby seems to have a coordinate that puts it near Durham. Guess this is an error. (I find my coords by using geograph or google maps) Cheers Victuallers (talk) 16:40, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching that. Should be 52 not 54 deg North - copy and paste error when I pulled the coordinates from Google Maps. My fault for not checking WikiMiniAtlas after editing. Cheers Bobschops (talk) 18:21, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow - aren't you doing stirling work for the co-ords in Derbyshire. Are there any left without them? Victuallers (talk) 21:02, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bob, I see you are still steaming thro' the Derbyshire ones that lack coords. I am trying to add to the polish you are giving them as you go. However, I'm intrigued by Bentinck. I usually use www.geograph.co.uk as it gives me pictures and a good lookup using the Ordnance Survey to find small places. But it cannot find this place and google is no better. I see there is a Bentick Road.... but is there a place called Bentick? Victuallers (talk) 19:24, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You might like to know, that, in edits like this, you can add a more specific region, for instance, Birmingham is region:GB-BIR. There's a full list at ISO 3166-2:GB codes; and they are always in upper case. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 11:04, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I took out your co-ordinates and you had to put them back - they were in the middle of a mess of vandalism, but I should have taken the time to check that they were right and save them. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent coord work, Bobschops. Kudos to you. --Tagishsimon (talk) 00:05, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Really feels like we're getting on top of the UK coording backlog now. Despite the bot's efforts to confound us. ~5,000 cleared over the past month and a bit. Bobschops (talk) 14:56, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, progress on UK articles has been startling; digging into the stats at http://toolserver.org/~para/coordmissing/ it seems to me that something like 80% of articles coorded are from the UK. Hence the rest of the world ... not so good. I take it you've met the table in Category talk:United Kingdom articles missing geocoordinate data, which is good for those of us with countitus? I'm currently mining Category:Unclassified articles missing geocoordinate data for UK articles ... I've found a hundred or so today, and reckon I can find the same again tomorrow. And if The Anome is going to find 30k more articles, as he expects to [1] I'd have thought the UK would not get more than 10% of them, and perhaps much less. So yes, progress and the auspices are good. That said I think I can count on one hand or maybe, just, on two, the number of people who like you have put so much effort into this. So, many thanks for your efforts; very much appreciated. --Tagishsimon (talk) 00:22, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can I add my appreciation to the work you and Tag are doing as you sweep through Surrey and the Thames Valley. Regards Motmit (talk) 08:33, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. The coordinates for the above, afraid to say, are way out. Would be grateful if you might be able to fix, since I haven't a clue how to. The marker needs to be in Elm Park, SW2 - further west of the present flag. In the relevant Google map, the school is located immediately to the left of the 'k' in 'Elm Park,' between Craster Road & Craignair Road. Currently appears in Street View as a scaffolded building site. Please forgive me for being so dreadfully unscientific. Should you need any clarification, please don't hesitate to get in touch. Regards Wingspeed (talk) 02:49, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]