Contents

User talk:CCWikiMan

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

Finding your way around

• Table of contents
• Directories and indexes
• Department directory

Editing articles

• How to develop an article
• Simplified Manual of Style

• Frequently asked questions
• Cheatsheet
• Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
• The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
• Help pages
• Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

• Community Portal
• Join a WikiProject
• Follow Wikipedia etiquette
• Practice civility
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bad governance. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:26, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stifle (talk) 11:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
20		Nigel Watson (talk)	Add sources
20		Alyutor language (talk)	Add sources
738		Business administration (talk)	Add sources
42		Boston Tea Party (concert venue) (talk)	Add sources
43		1996 cruise missile strikes on Iraq (talk)	Add sources
32		Honolulu Fire Department (talk)	Add sources
70		Border blaster (talk)	Cleanup
464		Danny Kirwan (talk)	Cleanup
82		Type 91 torpedo (talk)	Cleanup
61		Compagnie Africaine d'Aviation (talk)	Expand
2,041		Iron Curtain (talk)	Expand
1,533		Saudia (talk)	Expand
70		Perception management (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,957		Las Vegas Strip (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
508		Low-cost carrier (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
8		Congregation Beth Israel (Austin, Texas) (talk)	Merge
6		Kwalhioqua–Clatskanie people (talk)	Merge
7		Martyrology of Usuard (talk)	Merge
8		Manitoba Justice (talk)	Wikify
582		James Martin (chef) (talk)	Wikify
23		Santa Monica Track Club (talk)	Wikify
6		Marc Faddoul (talk)	Orphan
4		Icaroscope (talk)	Orphan
2		Baudette station (talk)	Orphan
73		Canada Innovation Corporation (talk)	Stub
29		Budapest Aircraft Service (talk)	Stub
7		Diego García (runner) (talk)	Stub
87		MNG Airlines (talk)	Stub
921		Andrew Barroway (talk)	Stub
11		Air Kasaï (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)

reliable

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ARjet Airlines and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hello, CCWikiMan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dearest editor and how're you doing?
I saw you reverted this good edit by an IP with warning of not providing reliable source. For plot? I mean these IPs are humans anyway and looking at the edit, I don't see any bad with it and it also seems the IP has no had history of "disruptive editing". Be careful to always check well before reverting. Thanks! — Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)

reliable

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ARjet Airlines and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.