Contents

User talk:CO16

Hi, I'm Famousdog. CO16, thanks for creating Uniformed Derby!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I think this page needs more explanation of the term "uniformed derby". Presumably it refers to the fact that these two teams were originally police and armed forces football teams?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Famous_dog (c) 20:23, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your additiontoMy Friends from Afar has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Begoon 04:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, just 17.37% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for January: Prisoners Fashion designers Geofocus: Great Britain and Ireland #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 15:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CO16. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ben Davis (footballer), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Eagleash (talk) 01:30, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Apologies, ignore this notification. The proposed deletion (PROD) was added in error. However, the discussion at AfD (see below) will continue. Eagleash (talk) 01:39, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CO16,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ben Davis (footballer) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Davis (footballer) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Eagleash (talk) 01:37, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I assume this edit was an accident. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:26, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:08, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Ong (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 06:24, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]