Hello, Campista1891, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Four-day week. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 01:43, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Jc3s5h. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Calendar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Note that sources mentioned in edit summaries do not fulfill the requirement to cite sources to support claims because these edit summaries cannot be readily found by readers. Citations are required to support challenged material by the "Verifiability" policy, and according to the "Citing sources" guideline the citations should follow the same style as the sources already in the article. Jc3s5h (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. General Ization Talk 17:08, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Pulse (nightclub), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. General Ization Talk 17:09, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Western Europe. General Ization Talk 17:09, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at World war. General Ization Talk 21:24, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Calendar. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 21:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edittoSabbath. Home Lander (talk) 16:09, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Western Europe. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Joobo (talk) 09:19, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Juantheman96, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Sjö (talk) 20:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
