Hi. Regarding the content you removed in this edit, do you have a concern the content was nonfactual (i.e. you attempted to source it but failed), or did you delete it solely because it was unreferenced? Ljleppan (talk) 09:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've tagged the article for speedy deletion because it contains multiple copyright violations. Every time you save a change to Wikipedia, you are verifying that you are giving the content into CC-BY-SA. This is not legally permissable if you have copied text from copyright websites and pasted into here. This sort of conduct can get you blocked from editing.Chris Troutman (talk)16:29, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ONUnicorn: I took a second look and yes, the article presents them as attributed block quotes. The Earwig tool doesn't show this formatting. This is my mistake; I've struck my comments above. Chris Troutman (talk)19:36, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have mentioned in the edit summary [1] that the whole article text is taken from parent article version [2]. It is just a spin out from that already existing wikipedia article. Crashed greek (talk) 03:37, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There was no problem with your spinout; you did exactly as required. The tool I used (Earwig) to assess the copyright violation didn't depict your block quotes and I didn't bother to double-check the article's formatting against Earwig's results. The deletion and copyright violation tags have been removed. Chris Troutman (talk)13:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, I'm Grabup. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dhruv Rathee without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sources like #6, #16 mention him as Indian Youtuber, also it is commonly known that he is an Indian YouTuber. I don’t know why you removed that without checking all sources?GrabUp - Talk06:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is unnecessary to cite that, Everyone knows he is an Indian, Also, you should check all cited sources before removing a small thing. GrabUp - Talk08:15, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Crashed greek: Why is the burden of proof on me? There is no basis for your opinion that it is ‘likely he is no longer an Indian.’ There are sources supporting that he is an Indian citizen. If you believe he may have changed his citizenship without any evidence, then it is your burden to prove why and how you speculate that he changed his citizenship. GrabUp - Talk03:18, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those sources say he was an Indian citizen back then. So after his marriage to a German citizen, the burden of proof on you to bring a recent source mentioning his nationality. I just have to remove the sentence, i would have burden of proof on myself only if i want to mention that he is no longer an Indian citizen. Crashed greek (talk) 10:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Crashed greek: Does marrying a German woman change citizenship? If there are no reliable sources stating that he changed his citizenship and there are sources indicating that he is an Indian, then it is not appropriate to remove the sentence without consensus. You are saying, “It is likely that he is no longer an Indian citizen,” and also saying, “I would have the burden of proof on myself only if I want to mention that he is no longer an Indian citizen.” You claimed in the first comment that it is likely he is no longer an Indian citizen. To back your claim, there should be some reliable source. Without reliable sources or consensus, you can’t just remove it. GrabUp - Talk10:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Crashed greek: You said, “So after his marriage to a German citizen, the burden of proof is on you to bring a recent source mentioning his nationality.” Dhruv Rathee was married in November 2021, and here is a reliable source from 28 February 2024, just 4 months ago, that mentions him as Indian. I think you are now convinced right? GrabUp - Talk11:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That free press journal is not very reliable, it has market share less than 1% or so. And he hasnt voted in the last general elections, despite coming to India during election, that adds to suspicion that he is no longer an Indian citizen. So I still think you are wrong, but i leave it here. Crashed greek (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not voting does not mean he is not Indian. In the 2024 general election, 65.79% of eligible voters voted, and 34.21% of eligible Indian voters did not vote. If we take your logic, then nearly half of Indians would be considered non-Indian. Also, there is no proof that he did not vote. Not showing the voting ink publicly does not mean a person did not vote. Your arguments are just baseless. GrabUp - Talk05:47, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Again you are talking as if I have the burden of proof. Despite being on wikipedia for a long time. I cant assume good faith any more. Crashed greek (talk) 10:32, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Kargil war, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MBlaze Lightning (talk) 16:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
