Contents

User talk:Deedee123123a

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tooting, you may be blocked from editing. Kinu ^t/_c 06:44, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tonga. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. -gadfium 01:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at NSYNC, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 01:30, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Earth Observing-1. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. askeuhd (talk) 21:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Carole Baskin. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shut up I’m allowed to do what I want Deedee123123a (talk) 11:33, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rosbif73. Your recent edit(s) to the page Boeing X-37 appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rosbif73 (talk) 14:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Daniel Case (talk) 18:42, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf^(talk) 01:30, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]