If you have any questions leave 4 of these ~ indents after your question
Tired of clicking on outdated links so I update them so that they have ssl encryption.
So, I don't know how to encrypt anything and editing wikipedia to update urls so that they have ssl encryption is not encrypting something according to my limited knowledge on these subjects. Editing wikipedia to update ssl encryption means adding a s to http:// so that it is https://. The reason why I edit wikipedia to update ssl encryption for urls is because when I am reading and clicking through random wikipedia pages I speed read through them because thats just how i read everything and I don't want to have to click through a prompt that usually says something like this connection isn't secure, I'm not sure why I get these prompts about the connection not being secure when I click on a url without ssl encryption but I'm assuming it might be because one of my many browser extensions is malfunctioning or it might be because everything about the device I'm using is outdated. So after clicking and reading through random wikipedia pages I just go back to the wikipedia pages that had urls without ssl encyrption and update all the urls without ssl encryption on those wikipedia pages the same day. This is also what I do to place archived versions of websites that are behind paywalls on wikipedia, after I clicked and read through random wikipedia pages I just go back to the wikipedia pages I found that had websites that are blocked by paywalls and place the archived versions of those websites there on those wikipedia pages the same day. Because these archives of these websites that are blocked by paywalls already exists I can easily place them on the random wikipedia pages that I am clicking and reading through where I find websites that are blocked by paywalls so that nobody has to pay to visit a website.
On the 20th of February you undid an edit made by Gbsat60onLucas Kunce, who had removed text in Kunce's campaign position list indicating he supports teaching CRT, because the source "literally says this". - While I understand that a casual reading of the source material can be interpreted this way, the source material here doesn't literally state that at all: It states that Kunce holds a position that "trends left" on "teaching CRT in schools". A common position that "trends left" on this issue, that many other Democratic politicians hold, is opposing laws that ban or restrict teaching about (historical and/or current) (racial) discrimination (and thus, basically all civil rights) in schools, which have been passed in many states under the guise of fighting CRT in schools. I would not be able to tell you from this article whether Kunce holds a position like this, whether he supports teaching CRT in schools, or whether he has some completely different related position that could be labelled left wing.
Needless to say: You didn't adequately check the citation, before reverting Gbsat60's edit. Please try to be aware of citations that use misleading language like this one, to imply more meaning then what was actually stated.
As for whether or not Kunce actually supports teaching CRT in schools: I am not sure about that. I tried and failed to find other reliable citations corroborating this supposed position within a reasonable amount of time. - He may or may not actually hold such a position. If it turns out that he does; the position will undoubtedly be added back with proper sourcing at some point. In the meantime, I've removed the statement about his position on CRT in schools. Wilburg22 - The insufferable potato! (Click here for my talk page!) 04:50, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]