Contents

User talk:Ecpiandy

Hi; at topics related to the Israel-Arab conflict, editors are restricted to one revert every 24 hours: An editor must not perform more than one reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes or manually reverses other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert.

You have made two reverts within a 24 hour period:

1. 00:16, 14 July 2024
2. 00:39, 14 July 2024

Please self-revert 00:39, 14 July 2024 to bring yourself back into compliance with this restriction. And FYI, as far as I know every RfC that has been held on the question has come to a consensus to include "Hamas-run" or similar terminology on the first mention of the Health Ministry, due to reliable sources considering this important information.

In addition, the "childish strikes through arguments people don't agree with" you removed were done because those editors were not extended confirmed; I encourage you to revert that as well, as such editors are forbidden from participating in the topic area. BilledMammal (talk) 00:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus is not for "Hamas-run" to be included. I reverted his initial edit back to what it was before. It is on you, not me, to stop pushing this change without consenus. Ecpiandy (talk) 00:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm popping in to say the same thing. You've violated 1RR. Also, please review WP:ECR for information about the extended-confirmed restriction that applies to the topic. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I reverted the initial edit which added the new text in. BilledMammal then reverted my revertion, hence taking it up to 2 Reverts. Ecpiandy (talk) 00:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You made a reversion, you were reverted, them you made a second reversion. That is a violation of WP:1RR. Please self-revert. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, when you self-revert I'll partially self-revert to remove the aspects I agree are problematic. Sorry for not doing so initially - I overlooked some of the aspects of your edit. Hopefully that will make you more willing to self-revert? BilledMammal (talk) 00:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Urm yeah it is better to talk through on talk page, I'd keep the "Hamas-run" and "Like in all wars" part out for now if it's up to me as seems a big step to keep in, if those are the problematic parts you are referring to. Otherwise yeah can self-revert and ask talk page. Ecpiandy (talk) 01:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I was referring to "Some sources have hypothesised that there may be" and "though it is not known who was responsible", but I'm happy to remove "Like in all wars" (true, and context is important, but that's a bad way to provide the context).

Hamas-run I'd prefer to keep, given previous consensus and the frequency of mention in reliable sources, but if it will help resolve this I'll self-revert that as well.

However, technically you do need to self-revert everything, and then I can self-revert those aspects to get them out again. BilledMammal (talk) 01:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undone for now. Ecpiandy (talk) 01:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and made the reverts we discussed. BilledMammal (talk) 01:19, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In terms of the "childish strikes" thing, I was unable of this extended-confirmed rule so I have rollbacked that, thanks for letting me know. Ecpiandy (talk) 00:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I see you're new to the topic area. BilledMammal (talk) 01:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback should not be used on good-faith edits, as you did here. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:41, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]