Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Christoph Waltz. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Thedarkknightli (talk) 18:06, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Socialist Republic of the Union of Burma, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yue🌙 22:06, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edittoJoseph Stalin—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – DreamRimmer (talk) 10:27, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Austria, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 15:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Remsense诉 03:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. You have made 100 edits, none of which include an edit summary, and many remove or changed sourced content. You are required to explain your edits to others better than this. Remsense诉 03:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
