Contents

User talk:Egghead06

There's one thing I absolutely hate about some Wikipedian's and that's how seriously they take themselves, particularly when it comes to the sourcing of information. You've reverted edits on this page, (Jay Mingi), claiming them to be in someway or another 'unsourced' and several times at that, even though it is very easily discoverable through nothing more than a quick Google Search, which would show official announcements by both clubs and similar reports from trusted football media outlets that the player will indeed be under contract at his subsequent new club Stockport County F.C., once the Summer Transfer Window opens, following his permanent transfer from Colchester United F.C. whom he played for previously last season. This is something which is also very evidently co-oberated by countless individuals as several other editors beforehand have made these same adaptations that I did, and over on the Colchester United F.C. page, he has also been removed from the Roster, which previously shows that the information which I correctly entered, even if it is somehow 'unsourced', still remains validated by other individuals, and should therefore not be reverted under any circumstance whatsoever. The only somewhat claim you have that my input was supposedly 'unsourced' is in relation to the fact that I listed Centre-Back as an additional position, and reflected this in his description, but this is no different from the fact which was previously allowed that he is a Midfielder, which is also technically unsourced, but likewise very factual.

So, I recommend perhaps heed my advice here, and some of other people below, and stop messing with our pages. Ill-justified Moderation is a form of Vandalism, so i.e stop being a dick.

User:Sinnz at 06:26 9th June 2024 (UTC)

Please see WP:BURDEN. Basically, if you add it, it’s your responsibility to source it. Not hard, is it?--Egghead06 (talk) 05:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've reverted something factual on eight occasions, something which SEVERAL individuals can co-oberate as they too have made the exact edits I did, aka It's not unsourced if several can equally testify its validity. Regardless though, if the fact this player has also at times played as a Centre-Back is unsourced, then why is he listed as a Midfielder?, Because that's equally as unsourced, just as is the listed position of literally every single other player in all sports on the entirety of Wikipedia, so why don't you bugger off them pages as well, at least be consistent.

And plus, no other editor, reader, whatever, has complained, you're the only one, so if it's that a big of a deal then why don't you source it? (and I definetly won't delete your citation immediately afterwards)

Honestly man, pages for lower league football are struggling as it is because there isn't enough people committed enough to keep them up to date, where there is, this happens. Is something quote-on-quote 'unsourced' any less factual than something out-of-date? Sinnz (talk) 05:45, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources. It’s very helpful for new editors.--Egghead06 (talk) 06:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you like to be viewed as dumb or what? Check the dates and count them: http://www.webcitation.org/6gD2NHyha / http://www.billboard.com/biz/current-boxscore You'll see that the numbers are not wrong. Stop reverting an article with two reliable sources from Billboard. If they're inaccurate, why you're keeping the stats in the box, with 1,311,343 / 1,311,343 (100%) and $141,140,438? What's your fucking problem?

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Please stop removing the Mike + The Mechanics' cover. I provided an actual source other than the Album's wikipedia page as proof.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 11:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you accidentally re-added the vandalism at Special:Diff/1222887386, I'm guessing this was an accident. I just removed it completely! Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 15:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]