Contents

User talk:EmpMac

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoidorexercise great caution when:

1. editingorcreating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participatingindeletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 17:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to User talk:Unpopular Opinion constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Mygerardromance (talk) 17:17, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edittoUser talk:Mygerardromance. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. tutterMouse (talk) 17:21, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you willbeblocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 17:44, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Windows 7. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 16:28, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for engaging in an edit waratWindows 7. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

— Aitias // discussion 17:02, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked because you broke the three revert rule. They aren't going to unblock you merely because your edits were rejected. I suggest you remove that unblock request before it wastes an administrator's time.

Your edits were rejected because they restored blog-like material, not because you didn't cite valid sources. - Josh (talk | contribs) 17:23, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At least that's what YOU say.--EmpMac (talk) 17:24, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At least that's why I was reverting it. - Josh (talk | contribs) 17:32, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, now that there are only valid sources, why don't you add them to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Features_new_to_Windows_7 , since I can't for now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by EmpMac (talk • contribs) 11:52, 25 December 2008

What part of that article needs to cite those sources? - Josh (talk | contribs) 17:57, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@EmpMac: There is no reason for removing your unblock request. You are completely free to request a review of my block. Regards, — Aitias // discussion 18:10, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@Josh: the Taskbar part, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Features_new_to_Windows_7#Taskbar , copy the part "Many people, including CNET, find the changes to the taskbar make it more similar to Mac OS X's Dock.[20][21][22][23][24][25]"--EmpMac (talk) 18:17, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm working on bringing Windows 7 and Features new to Windows 7 up to date with each other, so this should happen then. - Josh (talk | contribs) 18:58, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They obviously should be up-to date with each other, otherwise there's no sense in having two different articles for the same topic.--EmpMac (talk) 19:03, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@Aitias: Alright.--EmpMac (talk) 18:17, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Iantivirus.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 59.95.118.123 (talk) 10:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Intego.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 59.95.118.123 (talk) 10:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Flash4.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 16:07, 29 December 2008 (UTC) --J Milburn (talk) 16:07, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ExamplePatrol.PNG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ExamplePatrol.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:55, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really think this userbox: "This user doesn't enjoy dealing with black people" is appropriate? Nil Einne (talk) 16:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is being discussed at ANI. Please feel free to join the conversation. Accordingly, I have been bold and removed the two userboxes you created yourself as violating some of our core policies. WP:NPA.-Andrew c ^[talk] 18:46, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't make this [1] sort of comment in the future. It is inflammatory (see WP:Civil), a violation of our WP:NPA policy, and has nothing to do with improving the article Nil Einne (talk) 19:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Black hand2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nil Einne (talk) 13:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think you didn't sign your comment supporting the toggle box.Ferrylodge (talk) 17:29, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on the bigger and cleaner Flash CS4 screenshot. That image was just crying out to be replaced :) .. Kudos. -- Tomjenkins52 (talk) 23:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Flash-cs4-workspace.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Flash-cs4-workspace.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGa^talk 01:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]