Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Gig Young: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. DB1729talk14:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Will do, cheers for advice going forward. Although I think we can agree that particular user may not have been inclined to stick around too long. Fantastic Mr. Fox (talk) 14:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. TylerBurden (talk) 20:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because the section title is meant to reflect the content within it, how many Ukrainian naval vessels and military plane losses do you see within it? Feel free to add them if you have the sources to back it up. TylerBurden (talk) 20:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Explain how an carpet museum that is in Shushi (Karabakh) has no relevance to the topic, yet an carpet museum in Baku, which is far away from karabakh has relevance? Ofcourse not, I dont get what you are on.
Also, how is the azeri translation in Caucasian dragon carpets relevant? What does it add?
Why dont you ask the one who added something to make a case, instead of the one who reverts it? 2003:EA:4F4F:C28E:A992:F8E9:EA7:33CF (talk) 12:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have restored the last stable version at Caucasian dragon carpets apon further investigation. You tripped a edit filter that showed up on 'likely problematic edits', hence why I reverted you initially.
Dear@Fantastic Mr. Fox, i gave the bold evidence about the issue. The owner of ip adress has a problematic history with this type of pages and still could not afford a username to talk things fruitfully. Göycen (talk) 12:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Might I persuade you to put {{tq2|1=quote contents here}} around the IP quote that you put at ANI? It would make things way clearer (at least visually), and hopefully would remove the [reply] button (which is what is making things confusing). – 2804:F14:8086:B701:80CC:FCD6:43E3:855B (talk) 19:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disclaimer: I've never used block quotes before, only non block quotes (i.e. {{tq}}), which make the text green, but this time I'm guessing block quotes would work better - usually I just quote a part of a comment too, so I don't even add their signature, just a link... anyways tangent - looks good, thank you. – 2804:F14:8086:B701:80CC:FCD6:43E3:855B (talk) 19:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Please be aware that the article 2024 United States presidential election is subject to WP:1RR per active Arbitration enforcement as noted at the top of the Talk page and you violated it by making more than one reversion ([1], [2]) in the time period. Raladic (talk) 15:51, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was not aware at the time it had been previously reverted and believed I was instating a different idea, so in my view I was making the article neutral for the time being. I even asked people to not edit war over the image until there was a consensus established, in which I was promptly ignored and the image has reappeared despite the talk page discussion not yet concluding.Fantastic Mr. Fox (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Gig Young: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. DB1729talk 14:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. TylerBurden (talk) 20:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 06:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
