Contents

User talk:Frankie edgar 32

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Conor McGregor, you may be blocked from editing. Continually adding factual errors will get you blocked Murry1975 (talk) 17:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm adding the correct information. I have provided citations for it. Stop removing factual content please. Frankie edgar 32 (talk) 17:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you really Frankie Edgar? Editing another MMA fighters page? If you dont provide citations it can be removed, it only took you since 8 January. Murry1975 (talk) 19:14, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No worries man, I forgive you. Frankie edgar 32 (talk) 22:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With respect, these sources say it is a KO.

1) http://www.sherdog.com/fighter/Conor-McGregor-29688

2) http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2015/12/13/10021674/ufc-194-aldo-vs-mcgregor-results-conor-mcgregor-ko-jose-aldo-13-seconds

Further, the source that you gave also erroneously lists Anderson v Weidman 1 as a "TKO". http://boxing.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/boxingnvgov/content/results/MMA/2013/07-06-13MMA.pdf

Given that it is alone in referring to McGregor vs Aldo as a "TKO" and that it has made the same mistake before, I believe it is safe to discount it.

Please stop removing factual content, brother. Thanks a lot and take care.NerdNinja9 (talk) 00:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"The sanctioning athletic commission is who declares the outcome of a fight. Not bloody elbow or any other website you find. Those are the official results I linked. There is nothing to dispute. It was a TKO. Thanks. Frankie edgar 32 (talk) 09:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC)"

Your source has mistakes in it, as I pointed out. Every source says KO except your lone source that has proved inaccurate in the past. Stop being emotional about this. Thanks.NerdNinja9 (talk) 17:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The decision of a fight is declared by the sanctioning athletic body. They declared it a tko. Maybe you disagree, then you can bring it up with NSAC and have them change conors record. You saying it is a mistake doesn't make it so. It is literally the only official source of record. This page is to reflect the official record, not your opinion. The official record is a tko. This is not up for dispute. It is cited on the page with the official source. If you continue to add innacurate information I will have to report you. Frankie edgar 32 (talk) 18:35, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.