Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Fruitmince, you are invited to the Teahouse!  
1 comment  




2 August 2014  
1 comment  




3 September 2014  
1 comment  




4 October 2014  
1 comment  




5 ArbCom elections are now open!  
1 comment  




6 Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!  
1 comment  




7 Disambiguation link notification for September 8  
1 comment  




8 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pál Milkovics  
4 comments  




9 Disambiguation link notification for September 15  
1 comment  




10 Hi
2 comments  




11 Reference errors on 18 September  
1 comment  




12 September 2016  
1 comment  




13 Disambiguation link notification for September 22  
1 comment  




14 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!  
1 comment  




15 ArbCom 2017 election voter message  
1 comment  




16 ArbCom 2018 election voter message  
1 comment  













User talk:Fruitmince




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









User page
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
User contributions
User logs
View user groups
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Fruitmince, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

HiFruitmince! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:15, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your editto2014 Hiroshima landslides may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your editto2014 Hiroshima landslides may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your editto2014 Hiroshima landslides may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:35, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Fruitmince. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Mz7 (talk) 21:30, 3 September 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ban'ei, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Breton, Boulonnais and Brabançon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! If you don't mind could you remove the "bold" from the other delete and keep votes and just keep one? If you want to withdraw your vote, you can WP:STRIKE it out. Cheers. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I didn't mean to vote again, just to put some weight to it after all checking I did. Thanks for teaching me something I didn't know. Fruitmince (talk) 18:15, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, not a problem at all. It's just that we usually just bold only one either "keep" or "delete". Since you are advocating a delete based on sources, I suggest you remove the keep (just to avoid confusing the closer). Thank you for your help analysing the sources btw! --Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:28, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Even I joined to wikipedia in 2014 I did it for single purpose: I update article about Hiroshima landslides at that year...(It was machine-translating Japanese, cleaning obvious errors in translation and incorporating that info further.. Nobody else did it then and nobody else bothers with Japanese sources, either.. see ban-ei, in example.) And what comes to that extreme Google "litmus test". I was so sick and bored(well, not _literally) to whole affair... while ending up establishing few "merits of notability" for those that are unknown for wider audience(Sundance as bottom guideline, Category:European film awards as next tier, Cannes was just... I don't know, madness because Quentin Tarantino used to be *edit* in jury and I love his movies) or don't have clear notability rules "written down" in guides here (as I said "Gordon Ramsay"-merit(Michelin star) or other _award_ that generates publicity), for food/drink related people, and businesses that aren't in stock market....(Some salvo to avoid next macabre farce: http://www.nexok.co.uk/, https://companycheck.co.uk, https://www.endole.co.uk, https://check-business.co.uk . These links should be spread around for everyone that checks news business-relating wikiarticles. They may be useful.) And something I did for..... just to "establish" something? (OCD is fun.)

And as comparison... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_companies_of_the_Czech_Republic#Largest_by_revenue

Fruitmince (talk) 20:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Case Closed volumes
added a link pointing to French
Minami Osaka Line
added a link pointing to Nagano Line
Zetor
added a link pointing to Česká zbrojovka

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi there, I can see you are kind of new to editing Wikipedia and very enthusiastic, but please be a little more careful about formatting things. Please read WP:CITE and try to follow the same citation format as other references in a given article (using the citation templates or reFill is best). Also, please be more careful with using correct English structure and grammar; you often forget to include articles such as "a" "an" or "the". Also, don't just remove citations, try to either find better ones or tag them for people to look over and try to fix. Good luck editing! Montanabw(talk) 02:00, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


02:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 18 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Regarding Horse slaughter DrChrissy (talk) 20:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Horseracing in Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Champions Cup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Fruitmince. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Fruitmince. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Fruitmince. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fruitmince&oldid=1083591951"

Hidden category: 
Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation
 



This page was last edited on 19 April 2022, at 16:38 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki