Contents

User talk:Fuortu

This user may have left Wikipedia. Fuortu has not edited Wikipedia since March 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This is Fuortu's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 7 days

Hello,

I have recently submitted draft of GEM Enviro Management Organisation which is available on the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atindra15/sandbox/GEM_Enviro_Management this link. please go through the entire article and suggest me improvements if required.. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atindra15 (talk • contribs) 09:32, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Your draft doesn't have reliable sources; first one looks like a company profile and others are press releases. You need to find reliable and independent sources such as news articles and reputable magazines. If you can't find any reliable sources, you can't prove that the subject is notable. As that draft is already reviewed by another editor, you probably know that your draft has neutrality issues. Remember, Wikipedia article should be a summary of what reliable sources say about the subject, so please don't add original research to the article. Fuortu (talk) 13:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened a discussion about this move at Talk:South West Africa on 14 December and pinged you for attention as the move closer. I intend to open a move review to have this move reverted. -- André Kritzinger (talk) 11:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get any ping from you. {{ping}} will not work if you don't sign in the same edit. Fuortu (talk) 14:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Must be because I used @Fuortu, not {{ping}}, I suppose. Is it OK by you if I continue with a move review, or do you wish to comment first? -- André Kritzinger (talk) 15:04, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think you made good points in that discussion. I don't have any opinion on that issue. There was clear consensus for the move but I think more discussion might be required. Since there is nothing wrong with the close, you should start a new RM discussion instead of move review. Fuortu (talk) 16:53, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to WP:NOTRM, it seems new RM discussions could be considered contesting a move request close and the Wikipedia:Move review process should rather be followed. Personally, since this hyphen thing has come up at least twice in the past, at Heading and at Requested move, and will probably surface again and end up as a move-war, I'd prefer to go the review route and get the issue settled once and for all. - André Kritzinger (talk) 17:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a Move reviewofSouth-West Africa. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. André Kritzinger (talk) 14:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a Move reviewofGerman South-West Africa. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. André Kritzinger (talk) 14:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating Kevin Michael McKeehan! Could you also create Kevin McKeehan? I didn't think to ask for it before. 208.95.51.72 (talk) 21:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect created. Fuortu (talk) 10:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.google.com/search?q=apiece&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-US:IE-Address&ie=&oe= 2001:558:600C:1B:1504:76B7:A6D7:E00D (talk) 19:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Brian mansfield (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Thomas Green Ryman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Fuortu: Thanks for reviewing my submission and for your suggestions about additional references.

Obviously, I consider an entry on Ryman to be worth including in Wikipedia. According to contemporary accounts, he was one of the key figures in the riverboat trade on the Cumberland River during the 19th and early 20th century. He's also one of the most famous Nashvillians of his era, largely thanks to the historic auditorium that bears his name, now the sixth-busiest venue of its size in the United States and a top Nashville tourist destination.

I'd be happy to add whatever information and referencing you need to see to bring this entry up to Wikipedia's standards. This is my first attempt at creating an entry from scratch, so I'm still trying to learn just how much sourcing Wikipedia's editors require. The three sources I cited — two contemporary accounts from the most prominent Nashville newspaper of the day, as well as one from its current descendant — contain the significant details of his story, but his name and that of his business appeared almost daily in the newspapers of his day. He's referenced in several books, usually in connection with the Ryman Auditorium.

If you could give me more specific guidance about what sections of my draft need enhancing and the quantity of additional sources and references you'd need to see, I'll start making edits to bring it up to snuff.

Thanks.

Brian mansfield (talk) 22:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft needs more references. You need to find reliable and published sources. Can you add the books which reference him? Name-drops won't help, they need to talk about him in some detail. Apart from that, your draft looks fine. Fuortu (talk) 22:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a Move reviewofQueen mother. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. --Nevé–selbert 18:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Carolgriffiths5 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Diane Larsen-Freeman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

We reviewed and re-submitted an article on Diane Larsen-Freeman in December last year. Since then we have heard nothing. Is there something else we need to do?

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Uw-vandalism6. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Uw-vandalism6 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Septrillion (talk) 00:25, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Uw-vandalism7. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Uw-vandalism7 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Septrillion (talk) 18:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Uw-vandalism8. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Uw-vandalism8 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Septrillion (talk) 18:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Megalophallically. Since you had some involvement with the Megalophallically redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]