Contents

User talk:Gene93k/Archives 2010-Q3

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

• 7

Archive 8

Every time I go to a deletion discussion I see your name, categorizing all sorts of AFDs. You do a lot of tedious work. Rin tin tin (talk) 13:50, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

No, I'm not a bot, just an editor that like to sort and categorize things. Twinkle greatly eases the tedium of deletion sorting. • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Seconding this barnstar, per Rin tin tin. —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 19:28, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Just wanted to chime, as well, that your deletion sorting work is invaluable to the project!--Milowent (talk) 17:12, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm not surprised to see that others have commended you for this work; I've noticed your addition of this useful detail a bunch of times. Thank you!! Accounting4Taste:talk 15:44, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Little bit late, but I'd like to come in on this too. Keep it up! Alzarian16 (talk) 17:38, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Me, too. Nice job! Thanks again! Location (talk) 01:38, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Pls review the entry yourself for Deletion/Keep of "Paul V. Kane" that was unfairly nominated for deletion and inattentively read by those voting so far. Thank you, cheers! 72.83.107.120 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:19, 12 July 2010 (UTC).

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For your persistent work with deletion sorting -- it's much appreciated. --EEMIV (talk) 17:26, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

The article Choaster Coaster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

redirect from implausible misspelling AFAICT

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 16:46, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

thank you for finding the source for the article. google searching did not yield any results and i was unaware of the GNIS search tool. my suspicions arose when i ran into Beaverland at new page patrol, which was created by an editor whose sole edit was to Beaver Island (Antarctica). thanks, --PinkBull 19:09, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi. You recently participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/THD method. You might like to know that the article has been re-posted yet again, word-for-word identical, but my speedy request was declined so I've started an AfD debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doppler guided transanal dearterialization. andy (talk) 12:08, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Please see my major re-write of article at HomeFinder Channel 100 and let me know if changes eliminate objections?

Thanks for your help.

IPTV Pioneer (talk) 15:25, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi there, I don't know how to do this, but the main point of contention in this AfD is probably whether or not he is notable as a blogger. I see you added the article to a category of scientists, but can you help find the other category for it as well? Thanks! betsythedevine (talk) 19:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

*Note: I am sending this to all participants of the Kebab House deletion discussion

Hello,

I recently opened up a policy change proposal regarding the notability requirements for restaurants here and I would like your input, be it in support or opposition. Thank you - Theornamentalist (talk) 00:37, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of fictional magic users, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional magic users (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Axem Titanium (talk) 14:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Gene93k has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, so I've officially declared today as Gene93k's Day! For being a great person and awesome Wikipedian, enjoy being the star of the day, Gene93k! Signed, Neutralhomer A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, click here. Have a Great Day...Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:11, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for contributing to the anti-deletion discussion. Unfortunately, despite the lack of consensus and good reasons for why the entry doesn't merit deletion, an editor deleted it without comment. Is it possible to have this decision reviewed? 184.59.1.92 (talk) 14:42, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

You had previously edited at the AFD for Kamen Rider Verde, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamen Rider Verde. There is now an AFD for a related page, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamen Rider Ryuki Special: 13 Riders. Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 20:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

I note the Afds for the earthquakes are being deletion sorted under events - does that mean the earthquake project does not have an operating deletion sorting page - are they easy to set up? SatuSuro 01:48, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

		The Invisible Barnstar
		For your ongoing work with deletion sorting, which simplifies and organizes work for other editors, including the members of WP:WikiProject Medicine. Thanks for being the "invisible" wikignome that helps us all. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:39, 23 September 2010 (UTC)