Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Kivunim Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Giraffeedits!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!18:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Giraffeedits, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
Hello Giraffeedits! Your additions to History of the Jews in Finland have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Copyrighted material donation:Ifyou hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, pertaining your additions of a copy-pasted template "Historically, there was a Sephardic Jewish community in {{PLACENAME}}during the Middle Ages, before the 1492 expulsion of the Jews from Spain" to different articles about villages, could you 1) try to integrate your additions to history subsections into a coherent whole 2) preserve source integrity. In addition, I am also concerned that 3) the linked article Sephardic Jewish seems to be framed primarily in terms of a diasporic population of Jews descending from Peninsular Jews, not about Peninsular Jews. 4) the existence of a country named "Spain" in 1492 is moot and some caution instead of carelessly dropping the term may apply. Thanks.--Asqueladd (talk) 18:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your message. In the future, I will make sure to integrate the content about Jewish history more concisely and seamlessly into different articles. I will also fix the disambiguation links of "Sephardic Jewish". I understand your point about how the content of that article focuses on Diasporic Jews rather than Jews living in Spain. I'll also refrain from using the term "1492 expulsion of the Jews from Spain," due to the fact that Spain did not yet exist in 1492. Giraffeedits (talk) 18:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Giraffeedits! Your additions to History of the Jews in Finland have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
