Contents

User talk:Gjb0zWxOb

Hello, I'm Viewmont Viking. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of an article. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --VViking_TalkEdits 19:54, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Wickard v. Filburn, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 18:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't cite imdb as a source in articles. See WP:IMDB for details. Thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 15:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gjb0zWxOb! Your additions to Joseph Meyer (songwriter) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• Ifyou own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:52, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Xavier Vilanova i Montiu, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Gjb0zWxOb! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Colorado v. Connelly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justice Brennan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your improvements in architecture topics.

You can streamline repeated references by naming them and then just adding the named footnote in subsequent appearances.

See Help:Footnotes#Footnotes: using a source more than once.

You can see how I treated Julia Morgan and Timothy L. Pflueger as examples. Binksternet (talk) 19:16, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Herbert Cohen (fencer), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given the state of your talkpage, I imagine you know that you don't know how to reference well yet (although given the fact you have been ignoring those messages and not improving since August last year, maybe not). So I would encourage you to learn and practice by editing in your sandbox first.

Also remember that WP:ledes generally don't have references, so think about what and why you would add them there for.

As another note, if an article is a WP:Good article since, let's say, 2018, it will be more than adequately referenced and you inserting new references partway through sentences (i.e. disrupting the passage of information sourced to the reference already present) is only harming it. So just don't. Especially when you can't do it well. Kingsif (talk) 05:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of your edits are tagged as "Newcomer task: copyedit", but it's actually you removing chunks of information for not being sourced. This is NOT what the task is, and you are not developing Wikipedia skills while doing it.

If you find an article that is largely unreferenced, check how old it is - if it is quite a few years old, it was probably written before the citation standards we have now are in place, and it would be appropriate to add a tag to the top of the article saying the article needs references. If there are only a few passages missing citations, then a simple inline {{cn}} tag at the end of those passages is appropriate. Rarely is it appropriate to remove whole sections of an article you have little or no experience with, unless the unsourced information is controversial or about a living/recently deceased person. Tag the articles.

And if you are going to do newcomer tasks, actually follow the tasks. Kingsif (talk) 05:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Make sure that the references that you add actually support the content that you're citing the reference for. I've had to undo a number of your edits because you added a reference about the article topic but that didn't support the specific content that you cited them for. Your repeated editing mistakes are causing more work for other editors to clean up after you. Also, please learn to name repeated references, as you've been told about before. Schazjmd (talk) 15:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying my best to comply with these things but it is difficult and I am ultimately trying to support the pages with worthy sources. Moving forward I will try even harder to only use articles that are 100% solidly sourced and will put more time into this. I really want to help, sorry if I've made more work for people. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 13:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you are trying. But look at this edit of yours. You added: In 2016, she was honored as being one of the most popular celebrities born in San Francisco, alongside [[Rob Schneider]], [[Bruce Lee]], and others. Then look at the source: it's simply a clickbait slideshow "according to imdb". There's no "honor", there's no thoughtful selection; it's just a toss-away webpage that hopes to lure in readers. It's of no significance to her biography. I've removed it. Schazjmd (talk) 16:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is fair. I will continue to improve. Please provide constructive feedback where you find it necessary, my main goal is to help improve pages. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 16:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read the "Named refs" comment above. Follow the links and learn how to name a ref and then reuse that name to cite the same source more than once in an article. Binksternet brought that to your attention last month, but you continued to make edits afterwards without following that guidance.

I do not think that you have any malicious intent or that you're trying to vandalize the project. I think you want to be a productive contributor, and I know that learning all of the ins-and-outs of wikipedia is challenging. It's great that you're trying to address citation needed issues. Just be thoughtful in your source selections: read the article sentence, then read your source and ask yourself, "does this actually verify that sentence?" Schazjmd (talk) 16:17, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice. As of today I have incorporated the Named Refs advice and I am being much more careful in the selection of the material that I put in. I will also take your source selection advice to heart. One of my main worries is finding a piece of information that I believe is unsourced and putting a source there and it turns out it is supported on a different part of the page. If I occasionally slip up there please be forgiving. I think I've improved my edits a lot over time and I will not stop trying to improve. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 16:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, in your edit to Margaret Cho, you added two sentences. You added the ref for both sentences after the first one; that left the second sentence uncited. You should place the ref at the end of the consecutive text that it supports. Schazjmd (talk) 18:53, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok, I was kind of confused about that. I will reference multiple sentences moving forward but I will use the same cite rather than press the "cite" button each time. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 13:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great job naming a ref here. But this is where it wasn't needed, because the two sentences using the same ref are back-to-back. Instead of

• Sentence.(ref 1) Sentence.(ref 1)

It should be:

• Sentence. Sentence.(ref 1)

The named ref approach should be used when it's like this:

• Sentence.(ref 1) Intervening sentences.(ref 2) Sentence.(ref 1)

Do you see the difference? Schazjmd (talk) 15:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that makes a lot of sense, I think I got it now. Thank you! Glad to be able to have the opportunity to improve! Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 12:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AtList of people from San Francisco, please stop writing broken citation templates. I grow weary cleaning up after you (diff permalink). Broken citation templates produce visible error messages. Please preview your edits before you click publish to ensure that there are no error messages. Thank you.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make sure there are no error messages. Thank you. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 12:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]