OMG, you're from Cincinnati and drive a Jeep? Same. I don't drink beer, but my husband is huge fan of Ohio's craft beers. We could start a fairly well-stocked beer cave from our basement. Valereee (talk) 11:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:Valereee, I just learned that my colleague, who insists on saying THE Ohio State University, wears clean pajamas every single day. And he and his wife have their own body pillows. I don't trust you Ohioans anymore. Drmies (talk) 02:03, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not from Cincy but close (a little further north), and I've since lost my Jeep to one of the kids. It was a sad day. Hard to keep up with the craft beer scene anymore, but I still enjoy a nice frothy brew from time to time!
THE Ohio State University drives me nuts. I'd revert on site if I didn't hate it so much. Clean pajamas every day sounds exhausting. What must their laundry basket look like at the end of a week? Valereee (talk) 10:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
GoneIn60, please reconsider your consolidating on the discussion on the Horror film article. I feel like i'm being bullied and attack by the other user who has not been commenting on my suggestions and only bringing up my past edits and character. I struggled to find more information, and as soon as I did, it was just said as "too different", which I think makes sense as I've found new sources on the topic. The current consensus between you two, has errors as pointed out by the Rue Morgue source. As you were the only editor to actually comment on my suggestions per content instead of my editing, I would really hope you could reconsider. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:09, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The only "error" you keep pointing to is the 1972 film, but even if we remove that, that still won't satisfy your concerns. It is just one of many. It appears that you have your mind made up, that material from the THR and NPR sources do not belong on Wikipedia. --GoneIn60 (talk) 02:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for February 1[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Horror film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rue Morgue.
Not sure if you have seen the page move of KD's I-305 to Project 305. I think that was mistake. It looks to me like there is a Project 305 that involves making some changes to I-305 but I don't think that is going to be the new name of the coaster. I asked the person who made the move to provide a source but I'm not sure how often they check the site. Any idea if there is a time limit to undoing a page move? I was going to reach out to some admins, but I'm not sure how to search for admins who have helped us in the past.—JlACEer (talk) 18:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I saw your change to the movie Equilibrium's plot. I know the previous plot section I wrote was pretty long (over 1000 words) but I didn't know there was some sort of plot word count limit. Im pretty bummed that a bunch of time I spent writing a plot summary was just revised, and parts of the plot that showed that Preston was feeling emotions, were just left out. I think it would've been better if you just marked the plot as being too long, and needing to be cut down/ revised to be more concise. Can you give me a link to where the plot word count limit is stated?
Insnesnakos: Yes, it can be frustrating sometimes to see something you spent a great deal of time on disappear from an article (in whole or in part), especially as a newer editor learning the ropes. However, rest assured you can always retrieve your previous edit in the page history. For example, you can click this link to see an old revision of the page right after you made your changes. If there are some small incremental changes you'd still like to make, you're welcome to try again, but for a major addition or restructuring, it might be best to discuss at this point on the article talk page.
Before you revisit that film's plot summary, have a look at MOS:FILMPLOT. This is a condensed overview of how to write plot summaries on Wikipedia. For a more detailed overview, see How to write a plot summary. Unfortunately, we cannot recap every event in the storyline that affects character development. In order to stay within 400-700 words, we have to carefully select the most important events, and sometimes that means cutting details that seem important but are ultimately unnecessary. Hope that helps. --GoneIn60 (talk) 10:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for giving me the link, I'm planning to retrieve my previous edit and cut it down.
Hi, it's been about 3 months since I put the new plot into the talk page on Equilibrium. I want to know if you are still interested in the plot, I'd like to get a third opinion on it. Insnesnakos (talk) 20:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Thank you for your additions to Top Thrill 2 on the Cedar Point page. I was eager to get the ball rolling & add it, but unfortunately I still don't have the necessary editing experience to add in everything twas lacking. SummeRStorM79 (talk) 01:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's time to ask an admin for page-protection. I'm sure you're tired of nameless IP editors, not familiar with Wikipedia policies, wanting to change parameters to fit their made-up definitions. This edit summary kind of says it all.—JlACEer (talk) 20:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
JlACEer, yeah I already submitted a WP:RPP request that was declined on the basis that it was likely the same editor and per WP:PREEMPTIVE. I left a note for the declining admin here. The IP range will likely get blocked if they keep it up. I plan to escalate it further if so, thanks. -- GoneIn60 (talk) 02:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Suntooooth, quite welcome and thanks for keeping an eye out as well! New amusement attractions, especially major coasters, tend to attract a lot of attention. -- GoneIn60 (talk) 15:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, GoneIn60. Please don't get upset with my adding this topic on your Talk page? I look up to you because you have many years of editing experience. There is an unnamed editor ((or editors) username is just a series of numbers) continually making the same edit (I'd call it disruptive) on a couple of different film pages (specifically Men in Black II & Men in Black 3). I keep reverting it back to how it was. To pinpoint it, they're insisting on inserting "film series", whereas "franchise" is what it originally said, so I keep reverting their edit back to that. I'm frustrated & don't know what can be done to stop this. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. SummeRStorM79 (talk) 08:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SummeRStorM79: First, no worries about the post. Always glad to help! If anyone ever posts something here that doesn't belong, I'd move it to where it needs to go or simply remove it altogether!
In a content dispute such as this, the best place to start is the article talk page. Begin a new thread and explain your position. You may want to provide a WP:DIFF or two that show the edits you're referring to, which can be helpful to other editors who may join the discussion later on (even just a quick URL diff is helpful, such as this one).
I would start the thread now, and be sure to do this in the future as soon as you realize this is going to go back and forth (to avoid edit wars). Unfortunately, you cannot WP:PING anonymous IPs to the talk page, but you can mention talk page discussions in your edit summaries. If the IP ignores the discussion, then over time it can be seen as a form of disruption to the page. An admin may then choose to warn (and eventually block) the IP range or just protect the pages in question. However, the admin will also expect that you've made sufficient effort to discuss on talk. When an IP does engage on talk, and the discussion reaches a stalemate, seek other forms of dispute resolution, such as third opinion or leaving a neutral discussion notice at a relevant WikiProject (WT:FILM in this case) to bring in more participation. The third opinion process is one of the better options you have in disputes involving only two editors.
Hopefully that gives you a general idea of how to approach content disputes moving forward (also don't forget, you can always disengage and move on). In this specific case, you may want to reconsider what the IP is trying to do here. The link in the Men in Black II article points to Men in Black (film series), so that may be why they are trying to change "franchise" to "film series". That actually seems to make sense. While there is a different franchise article, the film series article seems more relevant to me. --GoneIn60 (talk) 14:38, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Tarzan (1999 film) § Plot rewrite. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:50, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
