Contents

User talk:Gowthamaprabu

Hello, Gowthamaprabu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Sun Pictures did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Introduction to referencing
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Ravensfire (talk) 15:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:MINOR for when to tag your edits as minor. Cheers! Jeraxmoira (talk) 20:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gowthamaprabu! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at List of Tamil films of 2023 that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Jeraxmoira (talk) 07:52, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sacnilk.com is considered an unreliable source, per WP:ICTFSOURCES. So other sources using Sacnilk box office are also unreliable, as per WP:FRUIT. Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 03:19, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HiGowthamaprabu, per WP:FILMOGRAPHY: Do not add future projects until filming has begun as verified by a reliable source. Jeraxmoira (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please kindly refrain from disruptive editing by reverting edits with consistent BO figures from reliable sources. Thanks Audit Guy (talk) 06:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Archer1234. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, George Maryan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  — Archer (t·c) 07:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gowthamaprabu! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Thavamai Thavamirundhu that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.  — Archer (t·c) 07:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Joe (2023 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 08:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Joe (2023 film), you may be blocked from editing. This addition after you were already reverted is puzzling. Where did you get the information for Think Music or the track lengths when it only mentions the name of the five songs? CNMall41 (talk) 20:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Shamna Kasim.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:24, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Singapore Saloon instead.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Singapore Saloon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hello, Gowthamaprabu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 00:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naam Iruvar Namakku Iruvar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cook. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good work in adding cast information. DareshMohan (talk) 23:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Tamil films of 2024, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gowthamaprabu! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Sathish that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourcedorpoorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Sathish.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:14, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Ghilli, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please see WP:NOINDICSCRIPT. CodeTalker (talk) 04:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

Submission feels like a Work-in-Progress. Please resubmit when complete.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Tamil films of 2025 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.