HMSConqueror, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
HiHMSConqueror! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).
Hello, HMSConqueror, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
P.S.: I appreciate the fact that, as a new user, you have added sources for many of your edits; this is rather rare; thank you! However, please see WP:EASYREFBEGIN for a quick tutorial on formatting those references. For example, in your Special:Diff/965623222 edit to Maserati MC20, you added:
<ref>"Maserati details the new, 630-hp V6 that will power its mid-engined MC20 coupe" https://www.autoblog.com/2020/07/01/maserati-new-630-horsepower-v6-engine-revealed/</ref>
Having the author, date, and name of the publication (linked to our article about it) all contribute to making the source easier for readers to find, especially when the online link stops working, which happens routinely as time passes.
Thanks. —[AlanM1 (talk)]—23:06, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Hallo, from this edit it appears that you do not yet understand Wikipedia's policies about sources. A source does not have to be available online. It is perfectly permissible to cite a printed book (even a rare and out of print title), or a reputable newspaper as in this example, where a reference to The Times, with date and page number, is a good reference (though it would have been improved with the article title too). To read more about verifiability, see WP:Verifiability. There is a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia but it is an interesting journey. Please don't assume that you know more than you do. Thanks. (pinging @Arrivisto: for info.) PamD18:36, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for July 11[edit]
Hello HMSConqueror, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Bittern Line have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
Ifyou own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI!15:17, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]