|
| |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
AS: In Bearbeitung gelöscht
Hallo Helohe, ich habe den AS: In Bearbeitung gelöscht; da ich annehme, Du hast den Artikel vergessen (eine Woche ohne Bearbeitung). Falls nicht: Er wird sich noch eine Zeit lang unter de:n:Die Rolle der deutschen Politik bei der aktuellen Debatte um die CIA-Flüge finden. Gruß -- Cesimbra 12:53, 23. Dez. 2005 (CET)
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0608140 (QM)
und der zweite
http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0608450 (Gleichungen)
und noch einer:
Perspectives
in Mathematical
and Computational
Music Theory
http://www.epos.uni-osnabrueck.de/music/templates/buch.php?id=48&page=/books/m/ma_nl004/pages/28.htm
The article List of longest non-repetitive piano pieces has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article is overlistification and original research - no references on why these works are notable for their length
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
 | |
| Two years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:55, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~ HAL333 13:58, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
