Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Joy Harjo. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. ℰmi1y⧼T·C⧽05:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, it seems you've mastered the art of Wikipedia editing! But alas, your attempts to inject misinformation into the hallowed pages of knowledge have been swiftly thwarted. Your edits were like a clumsy dancer stumbling through a ballet—ungraceful and utterly out of sync. Perhaps next time, instead of attempting a literary coup, you could try your hand at something more suited to your talents, like rearranging the alphabet Hscfbdcyu (talk) 06:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, it appears we have a Wikipedia warrior in our midst, bravely wielding their keyboard in the quest for truth and accuracy. But alas, your edits were akin to trying to paint a masterpiece with a crayon – crude, amateurish, and ultimately futile. It seems the only thing you've succeeded in editing is your own credibility. Keep trying though, who knows, maybe one day you'll stumble upon the elusive "edit" button without causing a digital catastrophe. Hscfbdcyu (talk) 06:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]