Hello, I'm Itcouldbepossible. I noticed that in this edittoKlarna, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ItcouldbepossibleTalk06:09, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I believe you've made a mistake. The edit was intentional and contained an edit summary. I'm confused as to why you're suggesting I add one for future edits. I don't think that the fact that Klarna uses Erlang, Node, or Kafka is important to note -- the two sources in those sections are from Klarna employees themselves (one being from Klarna's engineering blog, the other being a podcast episode with a Klarna employee). The company provides payment services (primarily) for people who aren't software developers, so this section provides unnecessary detail. I could be convinced to go the other way on this if the business focused on software libraries (for which language would be important to note), but that's not the case here.
Well, I think I am in error yet again. Thanks for pointing that out to me! But as vandalism fighters, we trust the ORES scores of each edit, and during manual review, if we don't see a suitable edit summary, we do at times treat it as vandalism and revert it. In your case, it would have been better if you could write a brief version of what you wrote to me on your talk page as the edit summary. Instead of just 'Delete Technology section', it would have served a better purpose and would have helped me in flagging your edit as a good edit. I hope that sorts things up, but if you want to have further clarifications, please don't hesitate to contact me again. Happy editing, ItcouldbepossibleTalk04:16, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi HyperAccelerated, I saw in December that you added the advert notice to Warp (terminal). I'm looking to improve this page. Could you point out specifically where the article reads like promotional content or fails to be written from a neutral point of view? Thank you so much. Catyeo18 (talk) 15:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It looks better than the last time I read the article, but I think the notice should stay. I don't see why it's worth noting that Warp uses cloud storage or makes their code portable between OSes. These are things that many companies do. HyperAccelerated (talk) 03:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, hold up a second. Is this article about a terminal emulator or a company? The lede doesn't match the rest of the article at all. It spends more time talking about the founder's previous jobs and how much they've funded than the actual software. This is an article about software, not people, right? I think most of the History section should go. HyperAccelerated (talk) 04:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The terminal emulator is a company - but I agree, more focus should be on the software, not the company's founder. There used to be a Features section when the article was first created but it got entirely removed. Let me work on improving the article to be more software focused - and I agree, cloud storage and porting OSes are not worth noting. I'll work on this and comment here again when that's done. Thanks for the feedback! Catyeo18 (talk) 23:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've been seeing a lot of your nominations in AfD and I wanted to ask if you knew about PROD. If an article has not been sent to AfD or PROD'd before and you think the nomination would not be controversial you can propose deletion instead of sending it to AfD. It saves the AfD folks some time and you can do it through Twinkle. StreetcarEnjoyer(talk)16:09, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've heard of it but never used it. To be honest, I'm still somewhat new here and I wasn't sure how much to trust my own judgement, which is why I've been sending stuff to AfD. I suppose I'm not doing a terrible job if you're sending me this, so I'll start using it. Thanks! HyperAccelerated (talk) 00:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I've noticed you've been active lately in PRODs and AfDs for articles in the Computing wikiproject. I don't disagree with any of them (if I did, I would comment there). I have come across some articles in this wikiproject recently and I feel like I must be missing something because many of them in my opinion do not meet the notability guidelines. I was wondering if you could give me your opinion on TiddlyWiki and SQLAlchemy. The latter is probably most relevant to you due to your recent AfD of Propel (PHP). To be clear I'm not asking you to AfD them, I'm just asking for your opinion. Mokadoshi (talk) 19:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks for reaching out! I agree there’s a good amount to be cleaned up. For TiddlyWiki, I found this review that’s not currently in the article. I can’t find a second source that would establish notability. If you sent this to AfD, I would predict that it would either result in a weak delete or that people would find sources that would save the article. For SQLAlchemy, there are textbooks written about the library. I would argue that this establishes notability. HyperAccelerated (talk) 04:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not delete so much of the work we are struggling hard to create. Sitting some distance away, you might recognise the importance these topics have to the "sum of all human knowledge." Fredericknoronha (talk) 16:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Itcouldbepossible. I noticed that in this edittoKlarna, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Itcouldbepossible Talk 06:09, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
