Hi, I removed false information and do not see how that is not constructive. I did not add anything or change any pictures-if that appeared to be the case then it was in error and I apologize as I have not edited before. Tzuffit (talk) 04:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but it is not possible to prove a negative. The person making the claim (i.e. that Israel tried to change the bird's name) needs to provide legitimate evidence/source that it is true. Tzuffit (talk) 04:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't. If you actually read the articles, Haaretz and NBC do not make that claim at all and only mention that it lost the vote to become Israel's national bird (which is true, and I did not try to remove that from the entry). The aa.com.tr source cited simply states that the bird has been adopted as Palestine's national bird (this is also true) and that it is being used as a logo for exported Palestinian products. The Gulf News article cites one person claiming there was a "major Israeli campaign" that had "reached all the world institutions and bodies.” They do not specify which "world bodies" the campaign reached or who exactly from Israel's side was responsible (government, nature society, etc.). There are no sources available that do provide this information, which would be odd if it was such a major public campaign. All other internet sources simply cite the Gulf News article do not provide any further evidence. Tzuffit (talk) 05:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
