Hello, I'm Velella. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ingolstadt, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Velella Velella Talk 20:02, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I noticed that you posted a question at Help talk:Adam Weishaupt. Since no one will see your question there, I have copied it to Talk:Adam Weishaupt just below your earlier question. I have asked an admin to delete the stray "help talk" page. If you have any questions about this re-arrangement, feel free to ask at my talk page. -- John of Reading (talk) 20:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Ian.thomson. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Adam Weishaupt, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
|
HiIlluminavissem! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adam Weishaupt, you may be blocked from editing. Denisarona (talk) 12:16, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Adam Weishaupt are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:12, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Adam Weishaupt, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 10:59, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
|
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
| I am Awarded with this star to stop GreatTruth123 from vandalising Wikipedia by using diplomacy. Hidden Hand Order (talk) 11:55, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply] |
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your sockpuppet accounts and unresponsive editing. The thread is Unresponsive and uncooperative fringe editor takes to sockpuppetry. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:10, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GreatTruth123. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:10, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. EternalFloette (talk) 00:40, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply] |
